• bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I meant majority in terms of demographic. Like we now outnumber gen X and boomers individually. But yeah, it’s nuts. You also have to consider that it’s 4.6% total, so even the millennials that are very rich (multi millionaire++) are tallied in that figure. So average middle class and low income millennials probably account for like 2-3% of that wealth.

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      On the scale of wealth inequality we’re dealing with, a multimillionaire might as well be penniless.

      There’s a few hundred people in this country that control more money than most countries. A couple of them have private fucking space agencies, and those are the ones that advertise their wealth.

      Billionaires are a cancer on our economy.

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I added ++ because I didn’t mean the millionaires with like $5-15 million net worth, but dozens or hundreds of millions. I agree with you, though. Billionaires shouldn’t exist, period.

    • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The word you’re looking for is plurality fwiw. When you’re the biggest group but under 50% +1 you have a plurality.

    • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You really need to factor in time spent working, these articles are usually worded to stoke generational war instead of class war. The main reason boomers and gen xers have more wealth is because they’ve spend more time working. It shouldn’t be shocking that someone who has worked for 30 years longer has a disproportionate amount of wealth. They’ve also had compound interest and compound dividends for 30 years longer too. The system is fucked but it’s not really old peoples fault. The only difference being inheritance - which if you think about it, the average life expectancy is 80 or so, people back then had kids around 25years old, so the average age for receiving inheritance would be around 55 years old. Making boomers a bit better off