I do remember democrats being linked to Epstein, notably Bill Clinton, I do remember them not doing a thing in regards to the list, Trump dug himself the hole he’s in because I genuinely think his ego’s so overinflated that his braindead supporters with the combined brainpower of a nokia 3310 would back him when he had refused to release that list. He used it as part of his campaign to gain support and the topic would never have come up had he not done so.
When Bill trafficks drugs and little kids it’s perfectly fine apparently. Apparently its only bad when someone you voted against does it, when Reagan peddles crack to fund central american fascists it’s bad, only when a republican has ties to noncing children it’s bad. Listen to your own logic here mate, believing anyone in Washington is there to help you is pure delusion. You can’t accuse me of “taking both sides” if I’m not american and I’m against one group of people and that’s Washington. Either ways not my country not my business. Just stating my opinion, whether you’ll choose to care about if Washington gives 2 shits about you is completely up to you.
I’m not Russian but it doesn’t take a fucking genius to figure out that everyone sitting in their parliament, regardless of what party has the exact same politics and is equally as corrupt, the other parties are only there to give the illusion of democracy, only in Russia elections are rigged and none of the “opposition” parties have any real power.
Then why would they make Republicans vote to block the list? Why not make someone other than Republicans vote to block the list? That makes them look like the child predators.
I don’t remember where the Democrats voted to block the Epstein files. Can you link to that? Thank you in advance.
I do remember democrats being linked to Epstein, notably Bill Clinton, I do remember them not doing a thing in regards to the list, Trump dug himself the hole he’s in because I genuinely think his ego’s so overinflated that his braindead supporters with the combined brainpower of a nokia 3310 would back him when he had refused to release that list. He used it as part of his campaign to gain support and the topic would never have come up had he not done so.
When Bill trafficks drugs and little kids it’s perfectly fine apparently. Apparently its only bad when someone you voted against does it, when Reagan peddles crack to fund central american fascists it’s bad, only when a republican has ties to noncing children it’s bad. Listen to your own logic here mate, believing anyone in Washington is there to help you is pure delusion. You can’t accuse me of “taking both sides” if I’m not american and I’m against one group of people and that’s Washington. Either ways not my country not my business. Just stating my opinion, whether you’ll choose to care about if Washington gives 2 shits about you is completely up to you.
I’m not Russian but it doesn’t take a fucking genius to figure out that everyone sitting in their parliament, regardless of what party has the exact same politics and is equally as corrupt, the other parties are only there to give the illusion of democracy, only in Russia elections are rigged and none of the “opposition” parties have any real power.
Then why would they make Republicans vote to block the list? Why not make someone other than Republicans vote to block the list? That makes them look like the child predators.