We all see and hear what goes on over there. Kim will execute kids if they don’t cheer hard enough at his birthday party or something? He’s always threatening to nuke countries and is probably has the highest domestic kill count out of any world leader today.

So I ask? Why don’t any other countries step in to help those people. I saw a survey asking Americans and Escaped North Koreans would they migrate to North Korea and to the US if given the chance (hypothetical for the refugees). And it was like <0.1% to 95%. Obviously those people live in terror.

Why do we just allow this to happen in modern civilization? Nukes on South Korea? Is just not lucrative to step in? SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME PLEASE!?

  • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The issue as you see it:

    clings on to a pseudo-scientific economic ideology

    The prescription you suggest:

    pseudo-scientific economic ideology

    • anachrohack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There’s actually tons of research that says that a free market economy is much better at alleviating poverty than a centrally planned economy.