• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I’m neither but I’d love to hear how you believe Dems can put a stop to these tarrifs? It’s either A. Presidential power (which I don’t believe it is) or B. Congressional power (which is Republican majority)

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      By being obstructionist. Same playbook the GOP uses with ease, when the Dems are in power.

      Simply not approving nominees and not voting ‘yes’ on Trump agenda items would go a long way, but the majority of elected Dems can’t even do that.

      Given that the Dems just issued a thank you letter to ICE agents, in the middle of their domestic violence, tells you all you need to know.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Every Dem just voted no on that stupid Bill, did nothing because they are the minority in both houses.

        It worked when the Republicans did so, because they were the majority in one of the houses and have been since 2009.

        So for 15 years they have been able to block anything they wanted. And it was only for 2 months really in 2009. Before that was 1993.

        A lot is/can happen right now because there will be at least 2 full years of the Republicans holding both parts of the legislature.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The Dems coordinate their votes. They unanimously vote no, when the Republicans can carry it on their own. When it’s a close vote, the Dems produce as many token turncoats as necessary.

          The Dems have also held multiple majorities in that 15 year period.

          I don’t think you’re stupid enough to not understand this. I think you’re a liar and a bad actor.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Your information is false and that’s why you think I’m lying. Show me 1 time that the Democrats held Congress and the Senate since 2009. If you win Congress and lose in the Senate it goes no where. I think you are completely failing at understanding how our government works or are as you said. A bad actor.

            • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              9 hours ago

              So you believe the republicans hold monopoly control of obstructist strategies? What prevents the Democrats from doing it? Why are Democrats continuing to approve Trump nominees? Why are any Democrats voting to fund Trump’s agenda? Why did democrats just release a thank you to ICE, as they build concentration camps?

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                No, I’m not saying they hold the monopoly on obstruction. Every Republican bitched for 4 years during Trump’s first term that Democrats blocked everything. (He didn’t have the Senate and Congress Majority from 2017-2021)

                Democrats shouldn’t have approved trump nominees, but even if they voted against they would have been approved by the majority of Republican votes. The one notable flop that Democrats won was Matt Gaetz not getting in.

                Also this thread was about Tarrifs, but like I said there are many really shitty Democrats politicians out there, it doesn’t mean they can block anything without getting Republicans to turn their votes against the party

                • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Would you like to get into how many times the Republicans have been able to rely on token Dems to cross the aisle to help pass their agenda? We can then break down whether those turncoats were primaries or protected by the party.

                  If the republicans can pass it without the Dems, that makes their betrayal a worse example. Not better. Wild you think that’s a defense.

                  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 hours ago

                    Can you give an example of one where enough Republicans voted against that it would have failed? If that didn’t happen yes it is a betrayal to their party, but it doesn’t mean they could have blocked it. (which is what people are asking them to do in this thread)

                    (edit to throw in) also It feels like a betrayal to us because we are further left than the Democrats, but the Democrats have a lot of overlapping views with Republicans, which if your voter base has 60% support and 40% against (things like Israel, it sucks but that politician is supposed to vote for Israel)

            • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              And how many of them do you think the party leadership primaried? How many of these do you think the party protected?