• Dr_Box@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Its crazy how Pam Bondi the Attorney General says there was no epstein files client list when a few months ago she said on live tv that she was currently reviewing the epstein files client list

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      She tried to walk back the comments about the file being on her desk, except she made those comments multiple times on different shows. She promised results within days, then nothing. Suddenly there is no list, and right wing news shows are now even saying Epstein wasn’t a bad guy and was set up

      • Dr_Box@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Next itll be that there was no Epstein. He was made up by the Democrats who are secretly in cahoots with China or some shit

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        It will be technically correct. As in, no one has put all Epstein’s client’s names together in one group, so there has never been a (master) list.

        We know that Prince Andrew is somewhere so there can’t be zero clients.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There may never have been a full list, but there was a little black book from 2008 or so. It’s a list of names and phone numbers. Donald Trump has four numbers listed.

          The problem is, there were also arguably innocent people in that book as well. Epstein was a piece of shit, but he was a piece of shit who liked to give money to charity. He also liked to hang out with smart people, like actual scientists and such.

          Just saying that by itself, the black book is fairly weak. Combined with other evidence, and it could be a client list.

          • fodor@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Wait a second. You’re saying this piece of evidence that would be the starting point to investigations of everyone on that list is weak?

            And, that could very easily be combined with the videos, and only after substantiating evidence is found would anyone be charged with a crime.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’s sketchy but also feasibly explained by incompetence. “Oh yeah I just started on that homework assignment last night” tier of bullshit.