• Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Abandoned mine several years ago. Kind of a shame, they were a good option for a while for people who weren’t windows fans but didn’t want to run linux full time. Apple just doesn’t really have any offerings for people who want a desktop that’s upgradeable, but don’t want to drop the money on a Mac Pro.

      • Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I did not find it that difficult, but there was a lot of up front homework to make sure you had a compatible hardware configuration due to needing hardware which was supported by the limited number of Mac configurations. I recall running into a problem where I wasn’t getting a picture on my monitor and I could not figure out why since my video card was supported and the drivers were ok. The problem as it turned out? I had my monitor connected via DVI and macs had never supported DVI so there were no drivers. Once the install was done, it pretty much Just Worked. Linux installs are pretty easy these days but debugging problems can be very difficult. The hard part of the hackintosh was keeping up with upgrades, since they needed to be done manually (due to potentially breaking things).

      • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s replaceable, it’s not upgradable.

        Apple doesn’t use standard NVMe M.2 drives. The controller is built into the SoC rather than being on the storage device itself.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          it never ceases to amaze me the amount of time, energy and money apple spends engineering things to be worse for customers.

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Why? Anti-features aren’t just Apple. All big tech do it to users.

            Edit: And automotive, white goods companies, etc, etc

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              other companies arent engineering serial numbers and other identity information into every component, even shit as small as halleffect sensors, so it cant be taken from a damaged device to repair a differnt device of the same make and model.

              To act like what apple does is an industry standard is nothing but blatant apple fanboy propaganda.

              • jabjoe@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Oh no, they are bastards. Extra big bastards in a sea of bastards. I blame regulators. The hope is the right to repair because law in more and more places in more and more market areas.

                Without the EU regulators, Apple would never have gone USB C.

          • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s more cost effective to integrate the controller.

            Being worse for customers is just a happy accident.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              You and I both know that Apple doesnt do this shit for cost efficiency.

              They do it to make make shit worse for consumers and “unauthorized” repair services.

              • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                They’re a business. Reducing their costs (while charging you a premium) is absolutely what they do.

                Apple’s whole deal for decades now has been building a vertical supply chain. Using their own SSD controller is one less component they have to pay others for.

                They just don’t give a shit about downsides: aftermarket repairers or user upgradeability.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Is this a take in regards to soldering in new flash chips or replacing a board and then needing to wrestle Apple support during an RMA to replace a faulty component (because I quiet confidently believe, Apple will cross check your hardware with their records from the serial number).

        And I don’t believe regular PC manufacturers/OEMs are that hard to argue with if I insert my own SSD.