• FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ah yes, the only possible systems are Capitalism and the Soviet Union, which in practice was basically state Capitalism.

      • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        …. Yeah, state capitalism.

        You’re not gonna tell me countries with billionaires, capital accumulation, market logic, are communist?

        The main exception is north korea but that’s just a totalitarian planned economy.

      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Your point isn’t that the PRC is good for the environment?

        China is pretty capitalist and incredibly environmentally destructive.

        Huge amounts of waste incineration for the huge amounts of waste. . Restaurants will serve you in disposable plastic tubs with one use chopsticks, wrapped in plastic, because:

        1. It powers the economy, and gotta chase those GDP numbers.
        2. It’s convenient, and is the PRC loves convenience over life more than an ironic stage persona of Jello Biafra.
        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          My point is that all countries are pretty non-sustainable, it’s not a capitalism thing. Maybe costa Rica, Iceland or Norway could be an exception if squint a lot.

          • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Commodity Driven Modernity is absolutely non-sustainable, I agree.

            As a country Iceland comes close, and possibly could be sustainable with minor changes you’re right. The others, I know less about the situation of.