• BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I remember they were glossy and attractive but expensive. I wouldn’t have bought one on a whim as a kid, and you kinda just read the ones school might have bought? Wikipedia is free and expansive; nostalgia aside I think kids today have it way better.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Lol no group of kids gathers around wikipedia to look at an article. Someone busted this book out in class, no matter the subject, and every kid in that class was at attention. It made learning much more fun.

      • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s cool you had such experiences. I don’t remember anyone getting excited about a book and sharing it like that in my school, which is a shame.

        Although I do remember everyone getting excited about the book buying thing in primary school and I think there were lots of DK books in that? My family couldn’t really afford that stuff so guess it just isn’t a nostalgic thing for me.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      wikipedia is great but it’s hard to stumble across information not directly linked to what you’re reading about. i think those books still have plenty of value as compediums of starting off points to later read about more online!