• susurrus0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I think we should work more, for less pay, with occasional pizza. That’ll help, right?

      • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        You make it sound as if it’s universal. It’s neither universal in human societies nor in other parts of the animal kingdom

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        But this predates humans.

        That’s not true. The biological world isn’t fundamentally based on competition.

        Competition inside one species actually is decremental to their survival. The optimal strategy for members of a species is cooperation, especially when that reduces scarcity.

        Edit: I forgot to mention that you’re also committing the naturalistic fallacy.

        • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          For those lower on the pecking order, maybe. There are plenty of species where a few dominate the many of their own kind, however.

          • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Notice how that is not:

            A) A universal strategy, or…

            B) A beneficial system for anyone involved. Nature is a cruel system does not optimize for individual organisms. It optimizes for the basic machinery of evolution, maximizing suffering if it’s beneficial to the continued existence of the genes responsible. Why give a fuck about genes when your life has unnecessary suffering as a result of them?

            Natural =/= good, nor does what should be true arise from how things are. There’s no answer for what is good out there, only clues on how you could achieve what you decide is right.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago
            1. Competition is still not the optimal strategy.
            2. The biological world still isn’t fundamentally based on competition.
            3. “Domination” for animals is something fundamentally different than the domination of command and control that humans carry out.
      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You are a lot more advanced than “only animals”. :) We dont see horses chatting on Facebook.

        Sometimes humans excuse very bad behavior by saying animals are doing it, which is very silly to me. You are a human being, not a horse. The only question is, how will you use your abilities that the horse doesnt have? For good or for bad.

        Humans competing with eachother is both the source of financial growth and also the destruction of the planet at the same time. If humans cant be smarter, we will get extinct, which is very fair by nature. We have everything we need to be smarter and if our greed over paper money kills us, so be it.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Unironically, probably, though.

    Like autism becoming more common in the modern day. It’s more that we have the tools to diagnose and recognize it, and increasing social acceptance of seeking diagnosis and treatment.

    The world being shit is just a nice little cherry on top.

    • Akagigahara@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Valid, but in terms of Depression and Anxiety, the link to environmental factors is pretty strong. Especially with pressure to perform and the ever-worsening news cycle, it takes quite a toll.

      I think the rise of autism diagnostics is really more due to awareness and screening.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, pressure to perform was as intense in the past, if not moreso. Subsistence farmers literally starve if they perform poorly. Communities die, and are strongly interconnected (and lean on each other with immense, suicide-inducing pressure for not carrying one’s fair share or violation of taboos).

        What makes modern pressure bad is not that it’s worse than previous forms of pressure, but that if we structured our society in a less-fucked way, we are materially well-off enough to not need that absurd level of pressure.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Considering the kind of mass-panics experienced by communities in past ages, not sure that ignorance is really bliss. Ignorance is paranoia, maybe.

        • Akagigahara@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I didn’t mean to insinuate that there never has been pressure in the past. Though I would imagine, the type of pressure and expectations changed.

          For me, it feels like current societal pressure is more abstract, making it far harder to really live up to it. But it might seem this way due to hindsight.