All from in this thread in [email protected] about a chant at a British music festival where an artist said “death, death to the IDF”.
After other users were quoting that chant in the comments and had comments removed and banned, the hero of our story, @[email protected] (appearing as “acargitz”) pointed out that under international law, fighting an occupying force is legitimate. But apparently not under world news rules, as their removed comments and the many explanations from mods make clear in the thread.
Equally against the rules is the call for the eradication of an organisation or business, even without an explicit call to violence against individual members of the business.
In the same thread: user @[email protected] had comments removed for being anti-American “(again)”, though I couldn’t see the first time. It’s not even clear to me how the removed comments were anti-American.
Bonus points for the “DC Comics” removal reason. Though this seems to be incompetence, rather than malice.
On the internet, nobody knows who you are unless you tell them. I don’t deliver special treatment to anyone based on gender.
You have a long removal and ban history in communities that have absolutely nothing to do with me or mine.
https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=6925869
I banned you in Politics for repeatedly spreading misinformation, as I have done many others, with no knowledge of their gender identity.
You think you get to determine if you are sexist or not? You think removing comments from a feminist and a sexist arguing, is being fair to women? Why do you think reputable sources are misinformation? Which sources SPECIFICALLY in that post was misinformation?
I have a long ban history because men on Lemmy are weak spined misogynists. I’m proud of going against your bullshit. Fuck you
You weren’t banned for feminism. You were banned for tinfoil hat election conspiracy theories.
Yeah I linked that itt and clearly stated that - I am upset about (2) separate issues. I want my comments (feminist) reinstated still, which imo was why you were searching for a reason to ban me and chose to call me a hysterical crazy woman with the “tinfoil hat” thing. You also brought up the woman eating salad thing, laughed at me, said I wasnt a priority (okay, then what exactly is a priority for a MOD, you dick), and generally treated me the same way a sexist PoS would about my concerns regarding feminism previously and now.
And it wasnt a conspiracy (the ban), I literally cited a documentary with John McCain and Hillary Clinton, NBC, journalists, the treasury department, NPR, etc. None of it is a “tinfoil hat conspiracy theory” - or is Clinton a conspiracy theorist? Tell me which sources exactly were not okay? What specifically was wrong with what I said? If you tell me a conspiracy, I can refute it by at least pointing out specific examples. What specifically did I say that is a “conspiracy theory?” Why can’t you tell me that? I linked the post. You permabanned me for it, you can’t take the time to tell me why? Youre so busy stroking your micropenis to your ban logs you cant tell me why?
Eta: Fuck you, you gaslighting misogynistic lying PoS
And comments like that are exactly why you keep getting bans and removals.
Ooh, let me look for the fucks I give
Being banned by you shows that I’m not a fucking piece of shit, so that makes me pretty proud tbh. And demanding the ban and deletions be reversed (because I didnt say these things in those comments and it literally is NOT why YOU banned me) also makes me proud. Demanding you be fired for months now makes me happy. Being a radical makes waves, which you wouldnt know bc youre a limp dick status quo bootlicker who abuses mod powers for fun
Btw still waiting for you to point out where the “tinfoil hat conspiracy theory” is. Again, just seems like you want to suppress that info bc you’re a bad faith actor.
I never said you were a piece if shit, you’re utterly detached from reality with your nutjob conspiracy theories. Good riddance. Politics is better without you.
Lol you just have zero reading comprehension skills, huh
Exactly WHICH SOURCE regarding elections was inappropriate? The treasury department? Greg Palast? Which one?
Any “source” that suggests voting machines are connected to the internet and are therfore hackable is suspect. That is a patently false allegation that you made REPEATEDLY.
“See I can’t be sexist when I hate you for being a feminist who stands up for herself.”
She’s not standing up for herself, she’s lying about her ban reason to try to gain sympathy.
She was repeatedly arguing that voting machines were connected to the internet and the election was hacked, NONE of which was true. She was warned, doubled down, and got banned.
Now it’s all “Because I’m a woman!” No it’s because she’s a fucking nutjob.