• Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Seafood requires far less effort to collect. Make lobster traps and trotlines which are catching food while you can do other tasks at the same time. Seaweed for some veggies on the side.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Seafood requires a lot of expensive resources to acquire. Boats, nets, traps, baits, access to the water, and not to mention the inherent risk of being on the ocean. Better to hunt herbivores on land.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure you can spend a lot if you want, but I have caught crabs with a bit of string. Seen people catch stuff bare handed as well.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Fishing is fun and good, but you still need access to water with a fish living in it. But a sharp stick or a rock is still cheaper and easier. Even a bow and arrow is very low tech and easily fashioned.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Well I live on the coast in the UK, so there is quite a bit of access to water. But even inland you should have lakes/rivers with fish in them too, even if they can be a bit harder to catch.

            Not sure there, most seafishing methods are illegal on freshwater here.

            • Bluewing@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I live in Minnesota USA-- The Land of 10,000 lakes. It’s actually 14,380 bodies of water 10 acres or larger. 117,000 if you add the waterbodies/ponds smaller than 10 acres. I’m sitting in my house drinking my tea and looking at the lake I live on. Minnesotans own 14,505 registered watercraft per 100,000 people-- the most in the US. And all of us spend LOT of time fishing on them. But it would be extremely illegal to use nets or traps to fish for them. (There are carve outs for Native Americans to do some limited netting).

              So historically, eating fish on a non-commercial scale has been an important thing in this region since before European settlers showed up. But it has never been the main source of meat due to the general extra work it takes. It’s still easier to stick an arrow, (even a well thrown rock), into rabbit or squirrel. And a far bigger payout in calories to shoot that arrow into a white tail deer, elk, or moose with less effort than a fish.

              • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Lakes are more limited than the sea though, I know here there are significantly fewer restrictions on sea fishing than fresh water. I can throw 50 traps off a kayak in the sea and I don’t even need a license or permit.