Moving from WhatsApp to Signal is an important action, right now. WhatsApp’s parent company, Meta, has been involved in several cases of election interference: America in 2016, Trinidad and Tobago …
You are definitely right but it’s probably almost right at the sweet spot. Decentralization/federation is great for privacy, but think about what most non-technical people can handle. With federation alone, practically all non-tech people would even fail (or be confused by) the first step, namely to find an instance.
So are there more privacy friendly options than Signal? Definitely. But are those user friendly enough most people could use it? I can’t think of one, but would live to hear some alternatives that are simple enough my mom could use it.
Not everything has to be federated anyway, it’s not inherently better for privacy by default, because you are putting your trust in more people. Signal can be audited easier than 1000 people hosting their own servers.
Signal isn’t perfect, but it’s the best option we have that everyone can understand to use.
I mean, people understand mails alright, which is fairly similar to the fediverde. They get very enthousiastic about AI and don’t know anything about how it works.
On the user friendly note… The unfortunate part is that I’d love to use Signal, but there is no one on it. And I don’t mean that millions of people use it is today, but there isn’t a single person in my circle that uses it. Even if i started today and convinced one person, to use it, it wouldn’t be something that I would default to because the non privacy focused apps are just easier.
So my arguement is there are no simple alternatives because every alternative still hasn’t solved the population/popularity issue. I need one of these apps to be able to import ongoing groups and conversations that people can just immediately pick up in signal when I abandon whatsapp or whatever… That’s before I start using it, let alone my mom.
Second, the CEO (disingenuously) stated they dropped SMS support because of engineering costs - , I don’t trust them.
There are free SMS apps, because your app hasn’t handled SMS ever, you just use the SMS API. Android itself handles it all - as of about 2012, all apps were required to use a single SMS database
Or just don’t use either.
Better yet, throw your computer into the sea
what’s the beef with signal?
It’s centralized but I consider it the baseline for privacy.
You are definitely right but it’s probably almost right at the sweet spot. Decentralization/federation is great for privacy, but think about what most non-technical people can handle. With federation alone, practically all non-tech people would even fail (or be confused by) the first step, namely to find an instance.
So are there more privacy friendly options than Signal? Definitely. But are those user friendly enough most people could use it? I can’t think of one, but would live to hear some alternatives that are simple enough my mom could use it.
Not everything has to be federated anyway, it’s not inherently better for privacy by default, because you are putting your trust in more people. Signal can be audited easier than 1000 people hosting their own servers.
Signal isn’t perfect, but it’s the best option we have that everyone can understand to use.
We get no privacy when the only server rug pulls.
Then we move on. There’s always a fork or alternative waiting.
You think you have privacy with buttfuckers6969 running your server? Reddit and Lemmy never cease to amaze me.
Never heard of end-to-end encryption?
Jesus Christ 🤦♂️ you really do.
I’m not sure what I expected.
I mean, people understand mails alright, which is fairly similar to the fediverde. They get very enthousiastic about AI and don’t know anything about how it works.
It’s because they think AI will make them rich somehow and Signal is just a “boring” chat app.
Nothing like a mall, and your examples don’t affect usability.
Your Mom could use https://simplex.chat/ I bet.
On the user friendly note… The unfortunate part is that I’d love to use Signal, but there is no one on it. And I don’t mean that millions of people use it is today, but there isn’t a single person in my circle that uses it. Even if i started today and convinced one person, to use it, it wouldn’t be something that I would default to because the non privacy focused apps are just easier.
So my arguement is there are no simple alternatives because every alternative still hasn’t solved the population/popularity issue. I need one of these apps to be able to import ongoing groups and conversations that people can just immediately pick up in signal when I abandon whatsapp or whatever… That’s before I start using it, let alone my mom.
I do hope they get there though
That issue is down to you. To us.
Convincing people is hard and some might never move away from what they have.
I managed to convince my family and friends, they still use WhatsApp to talk to some people, but otherwise they use Signal.
Not OP, but I don’t like that it has a crypto wallet in it.
Signal? What? Where? Are you sure you don’t mean Brave?
Signal has a “MobileCoin” wallet in it.
Brave is also awful.
Second, the CEO (disingenuously) stated they dropped SMS support because of engineering costs - , I don’t trust them.
There are free SMS apps, because your app hasn’t handled SMS ever, you just use the SMS API. Android itself handles it all - as of about 2012, all apps were required to use a single SMS database
U.S. based. Not a great premise.
I don’t see the point in using it. It’ll eventually become just like every other app like it.
That’s tech. Use what’s best for the user until the company inevitably chases dollar signs then jump ship to the next thing.
Both a lack of even basic imagination and deep cynicism.
Why would i use an app for something my phone already does in a smaller easier way?
You realize you are in a privacy comunity, right?
Might as well trash your computer then.
So, like, talk to other people verbally? No thank you.