• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      no thanks for their contributions, take the contributions but don’t thank them for it.
      You made this? nope, you’ve forfeited your right to claim authorship of it, it’s ours now, get fucked

    • 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      gaiman is at least actually brilliant and well-studied. rowling is a hack and her work sucks.

      but yes, fuck them both. they are monsters.

    • dandelion@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I wonder if there is any real relationship between influence and immorality, or if it’s just a salience error (those with influence are more likely to be scrutinized and immorality brought to everyone’s attention, and we just don’t notice the people who aren’t a problem while we do notice those who are).