• brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    I disagree. They bring guns to scare us. To let the protestors know there are consequences.

    For them to deal with an armed populace let’s them know if they start shooting, they might catch a bullet. They have to face that real consequence and it scares them.

    Until that point, they pretty much know they don’t face ANY repercussions for ANY action they do.

    I’m not saying to start armed protests. But this isn’t “flashing A gun” it’s 50 or 100 people who could lay hundreds or thousands of rounds at or in them if they do start using their weapons. And it will scare them into second guessing whether their life is worth detaining a few potentially illegal immigrants.

    • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      And, we outnumber them. Maybe not now with the amount of guns civilians own. But if the government starts shooting to kill random people at a protest. People will arm themselves and they will train themselves. The populace is a lot larger than police forces and military.

      I agree with your points.

      As someone who lived in Minneapolis during the “riots”, peaceful protest was instigated by police in order to arrest and get rid of the people in the streets. Then the police went to the news and said it turned into a riot. So many examples of police being instigators. Shooting sandbags at people in their homes, pepper spraying from their vehicles when people were walking down the street in cross walks peacefully, people beat further when on the ground bleeding. I imagine how the police would have acted if people were carrying. Would it have been a bloodbath? Or would they have been too nervous to do anything?