• TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it’s for the airline’s liability then wouldn’t it no longer be their business once passed to the consumer?

      • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well it’s not the airline’s responsibility if it’s not their responsibility is my point. If it’s her responsibility to inform them how along she is, then it’s her who is responsible. If it’s murder it’s her doing it. 2 I mean as long as it checks all the proper boxes they’ll do it to any of us, they just call it an execution. Even if they are able to prove the box was checked wrongly later. 3 people sign off on danger for their kids all the time. Is elevated danger murder? Is airline travel so dangerous it’s guaranteed to kill the kid? Plenty of lines here that shouldn’t get a “So mUrDEr iS oK?” Reaction.

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the disagreement here comes down to whether you think life begins at conception, birth, or somewhere in between.

        • teslasaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          There is no disagreement. At 28 weeks there is 0 disagreement of the capability of bringing a child to term. Unless you’re dying as the mom/birther, there is no way you get to perform an abortion after 28 weeks in any country.