• Niello@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Other problems with your post aside, you think it’s good enough to emit less but not worth it to actively invest in getting the excess carbons out? The problems they are solving overlap, but they are not the same set of problems.

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The energy required to take carbon out of the atmosphere is at best, double what it took to put it in the atmosphere in the first place. There’s seriously strong economic reasons that this is a bad idea.

      • Niello@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        And it’s perfectly normal for technology to advance and become more effective and efficient over time.

        • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          There are hard limits on recapture efficiency. The only way to make it remove more than it creates is to use energy like geothermal. Even then, the production of a carbon capture facility generates enough emissions that it would take years of constantly running, and you’d only ever reach it if you’re using 100% clean energy to power it.

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Emitting less is possible NOW. Removing carbon already in the air isn’t even possible yet. ClimateTown showed this in a recent vid. All efforts should be towards what’s possible and effective now rather than towards what’s really expensive, not very effective and may may be possible in the future.

      • Niello@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        What you said is the equivalence of putting all the eggs in one basket, which is a pretty silly use of the human resources available.