• Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    There definitely have been a case where the police, observing things with thermal cameras from a helicopter (for it is in the US where this tale happened), observed some house with a highly suspicious heat signature. …Some dude’s crypto mining operation.

    Well, that was definitely indirectly drug related.

    • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      ik there’s a lot of drug money in crypto but the majority of it isn’t that. Bitcoin didn’t get a 2.1 trillion dollar market cap though selling weed, a ton of that is from institutions like banks and corporation buying it up

      • Dontfearthereaper123@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        In a way it sorta did. Not directly obviously but if you look at the history of bitcoin, its first truly viable use was darknet markets. After getting established as the currency there, it proved it could work and banks n all started buying it, so it was the weed that did it in a way

          • Dontfearthereaper123@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I didn’t say anything abt the first purchase so unsure how this is relevant

            Edit: excerpt

            Silk Road proved the market for secure anonymous transactions based on blockchain ledgers, and the viability of cryptocurrency in general. Before the Silk Road marketplace, Bitcoin was mainly a novelty, with the first Bitcoin transaction famously being 10,000 BTC for 2 pizzas. Shortly after the Silk Road darknet market took off, Bitcoin reached $266 per coin, and the Silk Road marketplace became a $200 million operation.

            Source:https://www.avg.com/en/signal/silk-road-website

    • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      In theory it’s supposed to be unconstitutional to use FLIR on a house without a warrant to find evidence. In practice though, I’m sure they can easily ruin someone’s life for a while based off of “heat signatures”. This isn’t even mentioning what they could get away with if the Feds are involved. Who even knows anymore?

      • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Can’t use it to find evidence or get a warrant, but absolutely do use it to figure out who to target/where to look for evidence.

        Herring Vs. United States set the de facto legal basis that allows for this sort of evidence laundering.