• leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s not pressure under the wings, it’s fucking Bernoulli sucking on top of them.

    (So, yes, sure, it is gay, but it’s not fake.)

      • Rin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        A fighter jet is basically a fancy dart, and darts dgaf about gravity

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Flaps. (As in, the hinged bits at the back edge of the wings, that essentially change the shape of the wing as required, not by flapping the wings; that’d be an ornithopter, as in Dune, not a plane.)

        • Salamand@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          But… right-side-up, the plane fights gravity, has upward lift, according to Bernoulli principle. And even if we angle the flaps to decrease altitude, it’s still not dropping like a rock, the wings still generate lots of upward lift.

          400 ton plane, wings w 400 ton lift = flight

          Now (before engaging flaps) those same wings upside down would be generating downward “lift” PLUS pull of gravity. So now the 400 ton plane is like an 800 ton plane. Can the flaps alone lift that? Or, said another way, if we gave the plane flat wings, no Bernoulli, and stacked another plane on top of it (to make 800 tons), could it fly right-side-up just using flaps?

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’m 100% convinced this was never a battle of airframes and manufacturers and simply was down to: “No, sir/ma’am, I will not fly the derpy plane into combat. Can’t do it. YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND THE REST OF THE PILOTS WILL LAUGH AT ME”