Archived

US energy officials have found unexplained communication equipment inside some Chinese-made inverter devices.

[…]

Reuters reported the presence of undocumented and “rogue” communication devices in a number of Chinese-made solar inverters. These could potentially introduce unregulated and undocumented remote communication channels to the inverters, by which an actor could remotely bypass the cybersecurity firewalls that utility companies use to prevent direct communication back to China.

[…]

    • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Not naming the manufacturers is very disappointing

      It is. So I looked it up:

      According to the info I found, Huawei battery systems, and concerning solar panel electricity invertors they mentioned Sungrow, Growatt, and SMA. Growatt has arranged a patch, they claim.

      Many of these Chinese systems have little to none (security) updates.

      • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        What makes you believe that those software issues from a month ago are in any way related to the undocumented communication hardware found now?

  • RedSnt 👓♂️🖥️@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s not as fun and exciting James Bond shit when a supply-chain attack happens too close to home, huh? At least it didn’t explode in anyones faces.

  • jagermo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Ok, what are European vendors for inverters? I really want solar, but I would prefer local vendors.

    • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Fronius, SMA, Victron.

      The unfortunate bit is that apparently e.g. Huawei inverters are extremely reliable, whereas e.g. cheaper SMA models are not.

        • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 minutes ago

          In case you’re referring to the comment by HowRu68 above, I don’t think that those software vulns are related to this issue at all.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I wonder if an incentive to be well built and reliable ends up being the fact they are strategic assets that can be “called into service” for decades.

        This is some conspiracy brain thinking, but… they did find secret communication devices…

    • cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Fronius is Austrian and there are a few others but none producing microinverters that I’m aware of. If you are doing an install with no shading issues during the day, regular inverters are preferable though since the costs are cheaper and there’s no DC-AC-DC loss if you include a battery backup.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There are some for the mid to large scale, which this would affect. Less so for small scale like <<100 kWp.

  • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Spain reconsiders possibility of hackers causing blackouts

    The possibility of the blackouts being caused by a cyberattack was immediately considered, though the grid operators in Spain and Portugal both said at the time there was no evidence of hacking, a point that was echoed by authorities and politicians.

    Now, reports suggest Spanish authorities are investigating whether smaller power generators were a weak link that was exploited by cyber criminals to target the electricity grid, according to the Financial Times …

    [The original FT article is behind a paywall.]

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      China has been doing this in a lot of hardware. It’s a huge national security risk to not screen inbound hardware for problems, but doesn’t really happen because that would be a monumental task.

      Hell, look at what Israel did with those pagers. It’s crazy to think that other nations haven’t been putting malicious packages in their electronics as well.

  • B-TR3E@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Hmmm. Unnamed “people” of some unnamed US spook organization find rogue devices in an undisclosed number of Chinese solar inverters and batteries of not named brands which alerts Europe. Smells fishy.