- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
If “migrants” have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don’t really have the ability to either.
If “migrants” have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don’t really have the ability to either.
FTFY NY Times.
It’s also a lie. They’re not “trying to”, they said that it is something that they might consider. It has been done 4 times before too.
This administration has repeatedly shown not to care about the status or criminal history of any non-US-born person. Also, they have revoked the status of legal migrants to be able to call them “illegal migrants” directly after, despite them doing everything correctly and being in America legally until the rug was pulled out from under them.
And aside from all of that, why are we okay with the government even thinking of doing this to anybody??? That should be a major red flag even as something they are considering. But based on their previous actions, it’s definitely something they want to do, which is even worse
EDIT: Just realized your username is “freedom advocate”. You of all people should be against this.
Randomly generated username.
Why are we ok with it? No one said they’re ok with it. I was simply commenting on the lies the NYT are spreading.
So far I’m seeing that what they wrote was far more accurate than what you did.
Oh yeah, none of the immigrants were here legally at all
/sThe illegal ones? No, they’re not - hence being illegal immigrants lol.
The point was that the regime (“administration”) has cast their net far too wide; they’re not rounding up just illegal immigrants as you suggest, you wretched fuck. But of course you already know that and you’re just here to troll—or are you so fucking stupid to blindly believe that the regime has only acted against illegal immigrants?
Buh-bye! 👋
> FreedomAdvocate
> Dosen’t support freedom of movement.
Removed by mod