• merdaverse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Therapists are required to break confidentiality if they suspect child abuse. The church thinks it is above secular law and only answers to God, not to mention the protection it offers to its own child abusers. It’s complete nonsense and a good example of why religious tolerance has limits.

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This is not true. A therapist would be required to break confidentially if they became aware that their Client is going to harm themselves or others, or if they are mandated by law.

      What someone already did in the past generally isn’t reported.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That’s not quite accurate. Therapists are required to break confidentiality if they believe there is an ongoing risk to others, not because someone tells them of child abuse they committed in the past. In that sense, a confessional would probably be the same - you don’t confess to things that haven’t happened yet. You’re more likely to express ongoing risk in therapy than in confession.

      If the confessor indicated that they were going to continue doing things, that’s when a confession should become reportable, if we’re want the law to be secular and equitable.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Remember that episode of South Park where the Catholic priest saw child rape and exploration as a kind of perks of the job. Whelp they hit the nail right on the head 10 years ago with that one and it’s still relevant to this day.