• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Worth talking about in academia. Not worth talking about at length when communicating with normies or 99% of the real world.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, what could go wrong if we let propaganda, wild misunderstandings and distortions of reality, start to impact the public consciousness and affect people’s decisions or voting decisions or whatever?

      I literally can’t think of a single downside.

      • GenerationII@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        When you said that football guy kneeling wasn’t political, I started to seriously question what your motives are. He literally knelt, during the national anthem, in a political protest against police brutality. Politics isn’t capitol hill bullshit. I’m fairly certain that you don’t have a deep enough understanding about politics to come in here and be the arbiter of what is and isn’t political.

        While I understand the sentiment of your statement, and I think it was well intentioned, I think you’re wrong

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Someone else said it I think better than I could: Colin Karpernik’s protest was not political, it was ethical.

          You and I can disagree about the precise definition of “political” and whether it includes non-partisan activism that is dealing with pure issues of right and wrong. It is fine either way, I was just saying how I see the definition. I led off though by identifying explicitly political actions which are not “political,” by the propaganda definition. Surely we can agree that the “political” definition that doesn’t include those things is a bunch of shit.