• Hayduke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s historically on par. Always appoint the least qualified sycophant for the job.

    This is like an Adam Sandler movie only somehow dumber and less funny

      • Hayduke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fair enough, and Rob Schneider is an actor.

        That said, I suppose for the purpose of having a proven greedy sycophant in that position, she may be most qualified from the bucket he has available.

        I guess I am thinking on more objective terms, like, an AG that would follow the established rules and conventions. Adhering to the constitution and rule of law. If her recent behavior on Fox is any indication, I won’t set my expectations very high.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yes, Rob Schneider is an actor. He is perfectly qualified to be hired in an acting role, just like how this prosecutor is perfectly qualified to be hired in a prosecutor role.

          • Hayduke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Yes. I get your point. My perspective was one of seeing another partisan hack, who herself was a defendant of the successful Smartmatic lawsuit because of her stolen election lies, being chosen to assume this role. I concede that defamation doesn’t exactly disqualify her.

            I got it in my head that a prosecutor, especially one at that position, should probably be held to a higher standard, but in retrospect I guess that technically doesn’t really matter.

            You win