• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Okay but that stance in no way dictates that an individual in our actual reality, where there are no such idealist barriers, has already accumulated wealth and used it to do good things.

    This is the value judgements discussion. Feel free to exit.

    • Michael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      How much money has Bill put towards developing Africa and directly improving their living standards?

      Has he addressed modern slavery and modern child slavery (which we rely on for our cocoa)?

      Has he addressed colonialism and imperialism?

      These countries are extracted for everything they are worth, they are exploited for their labor, resources, and goods, and they remain poor while wealth concentrates to the few in first-world countries.

      His “philanthropy” surely helps him to be aware of the situations that these countries face. But let’s just shift an important topic and reduce it to value judgements. Got it.

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Because $92 million is such a large number when you have so much wealth. What would that fund here? A handful of buildings and a few highways?

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            His total contributions alone are $100Bn, mate. You asked for a very specific metric and got it.

            If you were to build, for example, a townhouse with USA labour costs it would be about $55,000 to $100,000, so you could build a couple thousand with that amount. Be a pretty dumb way to spend it, imo.

            • Michael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              That’s all I see Bill doing. Throwing coins at impoverished and exploited people does not properly address or solve the issues they are facing. Bill Gates surely knows of the exploitation that African countries face at the hands of western imperialism. He could use his influence to shine a light on modern atrocities.

              If they were paid fairly for their labor and paid a fair price for their goods and exports; these countries would not be starving, they could afford their own vaccination programs on the back of the own economies, they would be able to provide everyone with access to clean water, and they would be able to develop their societies as they see fit, including providing education to their citizens.

                • Michael@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 hours ago

                  If there is still slavery and these countries are largely poor, yet western society relies on them for their labor, natural resources, and goods/exports, his 100 billion dollars means nothing.

                  He could’ve spent that 100 billion a whole lot more effectively. Like shining a light on western companies supporting child slavery to harvest cocoa or enabling these countries to break free from western imperialism.