• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    Aren’t we bringing about an era where you can’t trust what you see or hear, unless it comes from a source you trust?

    Essentially aren’t we just reverting back to 1800s where news came from newspapers of reputation, and hearsay came from elsewhere

    • remotelove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s worse. We are reverting back to the age of lügenpresse and hearsay comes in short-form video formats.

      Many people simply do not care (or are even aware) if a source is trusted if the message aligns with their own bias or the message is presented as a new “fact”. Trust is irrelevant, unfortunately.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Basically, except the newspapers of today no longer care about reputation. They only care about clicks, the bottom line, and speed. Accuracy is no longer a primary focus.

    • DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      No because in the 1800s you could argue their was a thing called journalism. Now a days the debate between clicks and news means there isn’t going to be trust worthy news because it’s brought to you by Amazon AWS.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Definitely agree for the most part. I would say that independent news like AP, and the Guardian (arguably), do have reputations they try to uphold, but I hear you