• LouSlash@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    BT is good, but anything wired is (and always will be) better and more reliable while being a little less convenient (with some exceptions)

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Unless I’m paying for $1600 audio cables my noise-damaged ears can’t tell the difference and I like that I don’t rip things out of them.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        20 hours ago

        audio cables don’t matter beyond the $5 range. what you’re experiencing with expensive cables is placebo in that case. for me the annoyances with bluetooth are:

        • lag
        • a/v resync
        • high pitched hiss
        • having to keep headphones that used to just plug into the phone charged
        • the fact that bluetooth headphones degrade over time, giving them less longevity than wired
        • interference

        i understand there are people in this thread that don’t miss headphone jacks, but to act like bluetooth is flat superior is to ignore that bluetooth has genuine downsides that just a wire doesn’t

        • CucumberFetish@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Don’t forget audio quality drop when switching from audio only to audio + microphone. Shit drives me up the wall.

        • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I’m an avid fanboy of Bluetooth on mobile. Its not “better in every way” but when I’m out and about, it is.

          • I don’t have the lag issue because I only listen to music with it. But this is an issue, and while it’s better it’s still not consistent enough.
          • A/V resync maybe this is just luck but I have had resync issues with Bluetooth in like half a decade? Outside of my phone just sometimes not connecting to them or something.
          • High pitched hiss - actually not sure what you mean by this because anything better than $1 ear buds won’t have the hiss, and $1 wired ear buds are going to hiss after 1 month when the cable deteriorates
          • Wired headphones also degrade over time. Especially when you’re out on the go and they get snagged, tangled in pockets, etc. I got my current earbuds for Christmas in 2019 and they are still going strong.
          • Interference - again I’m curious to see what earbuds you’ve used in the last ~5 years. This really isn’t a problem any more unless you’re 10+ meters from your phone or leave it next to the microwave anymore.

          Anyways, i don’t expect this to change your mind. It just seems like these “critiques” of Bluetooth earbuds have literally never changed even though the tech has gotten orders of magnitude better in the last decade or so.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago
            • yeah music is fine, mostly
            • my $40 bluetooth set needs resync like once a day. it happens automatically, but while it does everything stutters
            • i get high pitched hiss on ALL bluetooth, even $300 sets. i think i’m just sensitive to it. i hate it
            • when the cable degrades i buy a new cable
            • i run into issues with interference with all bluetooth devices about once a month here where i am. i’m near a military post though, so who knows what they’re pumping out
    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      More reliable until the port fails. It’s just too small for daily use. They always break before anything else. Been that way since the days of the OG iPod and it’s maddening.

      I actually liked using lightning plug/USB-C adaptors. The flat but thick enough form factor heavily reduces the wear and tear IME.

      • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        I’ve never had a 3.5 fail, are you sure it’s not just getting clogged with dirt or something?

      • LouSlash@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        More reliable until the port fails.

        And so can BT

        Tbh i didn’t have any problems with 3.5mm. It always worked for me (even when used in odd ways and angles).

        To be clear. I actually like BT and the ways it opens in terms of various accessories, but BT has its drawbacks while analog ports. That’s why i would prefer to have both BT and physical port (in case of BT failing)

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Part of it is use case. You don’t (typically) pull the iPod or any music player out over and over 100 times a day like a phone, so it often sat in your pocket for longer stretches. Big risk to cables because you’d progressively bend the end of the cord or gradually fuck up the port itself.

          It’s not about build quality, it’s that small/thin things are generally more liable to bend/warp/snap. If it was a quarter inch plug (absurd but bear with me) this would be a non-issue due to the sheer size.