(this is a sarcastic post meant to highlight the absurdity of some of the “greater good” rhetoric we’ve been hearing, especially around leaving vulnerable populations like disabled people behind in case of revolution, basically accelerationism)

  • electric_nan@lemmy.mlEnglish
    1·
    9 days ago

    Seems like you’re characterizing the dems as “good”. Aren’t they the “lesser evil”?

    • Boppel@feddit.orgEnglish
      0·
      9 days ago

      semantics - and thus we fight. point proven. Orange Hitler didn’t win against left. left couldn’t agree if they save democracy or defend democracy so they did neither

      • electric_nan@lemmy.mlEnglish
        2·
        9 days ago

        You say semantics, but I find that liberals genuinely can’t seem to decide if their political leaders are “super good people, actually”, or “admittedly terrible war criminals, but not as bad as the other guy”.

    • Montagge@lemmy.zipEnglish
      0·
      9 days ago

      I don’t consider Democrats as leftist, and I thought the subject was leftist infighting

      • electric_nan@lemmy.mlEnglish
        2·
        9 days ago

        I’ve misunderstood you then. Can you explain who is perfect and who is good in your analogy?