• EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No but at this age you should probably ask yourself at what point in life did you stoop so low as to want to communicate with the French.

    /s

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s never too late to learn a language but it’s a bit of an uphill battle, and you’re not going to learn it by just watching shows. You need to practice regularly and understand the grammar and sentence structure. You also have to speak it with other people to get feedback, you can’t only learn to listen.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s about brain plasticity and 25 is kind of the same as 45…

      So they can learn French in an “anything is possible if you try” kind of way, but realistically unless they straight up move to France and completely dive into it, it’s going to be a massive struggle to get to where they can even understand French shows without English subtitles.

      Like, at a certain point people should realistically evaluate the amount of work and payoff they get from stuff.

      Marrying a French person and wanting to learn their language? Yeah. That’s probably worth the work.

      Wanting to watch French TV without reading? Not so much

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Brain plasticity, window of opportunity, it’s all babble. You can learn new languages just fine as you age; the matter here is how much time you spend using the language.

    The reason why adults perform generally worse than kids learning languages is mostly motivational, and not spending enough time with the language. But as an adult you got access to a bunch of resources that kids wouldn’t, such as a decent grasp of grammar on theoretical grounds, that you can (and should) use to your advantage.

    Note however that watching sitcoms will likely not be enough to get any decent grasp of any language. (Otherwise I’d be speaking Japanese, given the amount of anime that I watch.) You’ll need proficiency on four levels: hearing, speaking, reading, writing.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I’m over 25, is it still too late

    Just stop. I don’t mean to be one of those people but you apparently have no idea how young 25 is. People have started over, gone to school, completely changed careers, moved to new countries, and yes: learned different languages in their 70’s+. It’s not too late for them, and it’s not even close to too late for you.

    Children seem to have the easiest time learning a new language, but the rest of us can as well! The key is immersion. If you can converse with a native-speaker every day, you’ll probably have the most success, but whatever you do, be consistent!

  • Nevrome@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s never too late to learn a language. However, French is one hell of a step coming from English.

    French is my main language and even if I’ve been speaking it for close to 40 years now, I still learn language exceptions and rules today.

    Still, I’d give it a go if I were you, learning something new is always fun. Enjoy!

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      French is tough, but I’d argue it isn’t that hard compared to some other languages. Grammatical gender and conjugation are a pain in the ass, but the vocabulary is very familiar to a native English-speaker because of the languages’ common history (thanks, William the Conqueror)

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Im Canadian and also already have a significant french education, just never got “conversational”, def have since like age 3 exposure if only Ontarioish

  • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never too late. Rote memorisation becomes more difficult as we age, but it’s not impossible. I’ve been learning one of the more difficult languages (Finnish) in my 40s for about 300 days now, and I am making progress.

    Look into ‘active learning’, it’s far more effective than apps like DuoLingo (which I use heavily, it does have its place)

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work for the Federal Government of Canada, and for reasons that are hopefully obvious, it’s important that they are able to have a pipeline that teaches French to people over the age of 25 in about a year. It’s not as simple as just watching media though. The French training for public servants starting at 0 French is a full-time job. People literally disappear from their jobs for a year or more in order to learn French.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ask your manager. Different departments have different amounts of training available. Also look into the CSPS French training.

        At my department, there is also in-house part-time training. It just varies a lot from department to department.

        The full-time training I mentioned is usually offered to people who are lined up for a manager/director job since there’s the baguette-glass-ceiling

  • 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes you can, with one caveat.

    According to Stephen Krashen’s input hypothesis, compelling, comprehensible input is sufficient to acquire a language. That means input that you find interesting and that keeps you engaged, and which you can understand at least in part. That evolving sweet spot can indeed take you from complete newbie to fluency without ever speaking.

    In my experience, though, being able to speak with other native speakers is a huge source of motivation and creates its own compelling input. So I wouldn’t discount that.

    I personally know someone who went from no English to being able to converse just by watching The Simpsons.

  • prunerye@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Adults are worse at passive learning than kids, but focused learning works just fine. You’re probably better off buying/pirating something like rosetta stone than you are watching sitcoms.

  • sosodev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As others have said it is never too late to learn a language. Our brains are just as capable, if not more, when we’re adults.

    I’m also a firm believer that comprehensible input (listening and attempting to understand) is the best way to learn a language. You can’t start with high level speech though. You need to start with speech that is aimed at beginners or you won’t understand enough for it to be effective.

    Studying vocabulary in parallel helps a lot because it helps you learn niche words that don’t come up often in normal speech.

    The typical recommendation with comprehensible input is to listen for around a thousand hours and then start practicing with conversation and books as well.

    Good luck! Remember that with enough dedicated time you can learn anything. :)

  • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Too late! What is this? Lol

    I’m in my mid-40s, already speak English and Spanish, and I’m picking up Portuguese just because I’m around Brazilian people so damned often up here in Massachusetts.

    Of course it’s not too late. Having actual conversations in context is the easiest way to kind of passively pick up a new language. You can use apps or Google translate for vocabulary and details

  • Saraphim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would say you probably won’t have as much success just listening to something than you would communicating back, no matter how much you immerse yourself. My spoken French is godawful, but my comprehension is good so I can follow along with tv shows and such, but my communication doesn’t improve much as there is no back and forth.

  • Hodrobond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anecdotally, I know a few immigrants that learned English through TV at a later age. If you’re interested, don’t let your age hold you back!

  • Cambionn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    No and no. It’s not too late, and just watching sitcons won’t teach you enough to start speaking. But if you just start actual studying and practicing you can learn it just fine. Watching TV can be used to practice listening, but on it’s own it’s not enough unless you’re a wonderkid.