I think the idea was that “donut” ≡ “do not”.
Those who sexually assault others are rewarded with doughnuts
Does it also work the other way around? Can I offer someone doughnuts to sexually assault me?
If you’re the one offering, it’s not assault, so they shouldn’t even get the donut
Must. not. obey. the rape donut…
Makes me think of the DARE pencils that said “It’s not cool to do drugs” which, as they were sharpened, would eventually say “cool to do drugs” and then “do drugs”.
And finally, just “rugs”.
That’s how I became a carpet muncher
Well the good news is the concept of “consent” is being talked about, if somewhat imperfectly.
Back In The Day there was no concept of consent. Even in the courts. That’s the whole “you were wearing these clothes so you wanted to be attacked” thing. Which we just saw in the headlines the other day from some evangelical chud or other (or was it a judge? Whatever).
“You can do anything, the left will promote and understand and tolerate anything, as long as there is one element. Do you know what it is? Consent.”
“If there is consent on both or all three or all four, however many are involved in the sex act, it’s perfectly fine, whatever it is. But if the left ever senses and smells that there’s no consent in part of the equation then here come the rape police. But consent is the magic key to the left.”
~Rush Limbaugh
