Berlin’s immigration authorities are moving to deport four young foreign residents on allegations related to participation in protests against Israel’s war on Gaza, an unprecedented move that raises serious concerns over civil liberties in Germany.

The deportation orders, issued under German migration law, were made amid political pressure and over internal objections from the head of the state of Berlin’s immigration agency.

The internal strife arose because three of those targeted for deportation are citizens of European Union member states who normally enjoy freedom of movement between E.U. countries. None of the four has been convicted of any crimes.

“What we’re seeing here is straight out of the far right’s playbook,” said Alexander Gorski, a lawyer representing two of the protesters. “You can see it in the U.S. and Germany, too: Political dissent is silenced by targeting the migration status of protesters.”

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Nuance for genocide what is next nuance for Adolf Hitler? “Well he did kill all those Jews but you have to remember he was denied his art education!”

    Here is a good rule to live by:

    Genocide bad.

    • 404UsernameNotFound@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Nobody has ever suggested that genocide is a good thing; that is an argument you introduced yourself. Furthermore, you alleged that Germany supports genocide without elaborating on how this claim is substantiated.

      • dan00@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        No more replies from mr. Bothsidism what happened? I read your vomit and when shit gets serious you don’t reply anymore? We are all waiting your defence for a genocidal ethnostate. Please elaborate.

        • 404UsernameNotFound@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          What is the point of an answer if no one is interested in engaging with it? The thread merely serves as an echo chamber for your opinion. Judging by the responses, meaningful discourse on the topic appears unwelcome.

          • dan00@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m interested and I’m also pretty fed up seeing people defending Israel, USA and Germany (but many others too) WHILE PEOPLE ARE DYING in this moment.

            3,000 portable anti-tank weapons, 500,000 rounds of ammunition for fully and semi-automatic firearms as well as other fuses and propellants. Much of the over €300 million was spent on armored vehicles, military trucks and safety glass.

            Is this the humanitarian aid you blabber about? So yes, your argument is unwelcome and you need to know that. Don’t agree? Then please explain.

            • 404UsernameNotFound@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              The original post reads, “Germany Turns to U.S. Playbook: Deportations Target Gaza War Protesters.” This statement is inaccurate; it represents a misleading portrayal. Many participants in this thread seem unconcerned about whether the statement is true or merely aligns with their perception of the situation. I don’t see why I should continue engaging with the post if it solely serves as an echo chamber for a predetermined opinion.

                • 404UsernameNotFound@lemmy.wtf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  From a psychological standpoint, your comment reflects a tone that appears intentionally dismissive, likely aimed at conveying disdain rather than engaging in substantive dialogue. This could suggest an underlying projection of personal insecurities or unresolved emotions. The phrasing indicates an effort to assert dominance in the conversation, potentially as a defense mechanism, while simultaneously closing off opportunities for mutual understanding. Such communication patterns often serve to escalate conflict rather than foster resolution or reduce interpersonal tension.

                  • dan00@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    Thank you doc for the unrequested shrink session.

                    You are right, I’m intentionally dismissive, trying to convey my complete disdain and, honesty, I hope you saw my utter and pure disgust for someone who defends cops that arrest literally fucking children -again maybe you missed while in your psychology class- WHO PROTEST AGAINST A FUCKING GENOCIDE.

                    Source (btw this is just one article, the first that popped up on Google) Fascist german police

                    As long as your argument are ad hominem (you got me bigboy, I’m crying now) and your replies are pathetic genocidal defence, this will be the attitude you will receive from me and hopefully from everyone, online and in person.

                    Also, where is your effort to understand that genocide doesn’t have nuances? Where are your sources mr psychology my ass?