I am seeing posts from https://hexbear.net/ once again. Anyone know what happened since they lost their domain name? How did they get it back?

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      don’t see people in there praising putin or uncritically accepting every action that non capitalist governments do. What i do see is a lot of challenging the standard western capitalist propaganda narrative.

      That’s nearly all I’ve seen. It appears to me much of the fault lies with critique by US American in particular who seem beyond nuance in politics (not having multiple political parties is perhaps the reason for that), you can be anti Putin (who is a complete cnut, that doeat mean ebery sungle russian is) and anti US (who are now complete cnuts for who they elected but doesn’t mean every single citizen is).

      I like seeing the points of view so long may you continue!

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I snoop there from time to time, and while it does have a high population of minorities, there is people who are pro-russia. A lot fo people say they only have critical support, but I can’t see how you could have even critical support of russia.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      IDK, I used to talk up certain parts of Hexbear (art@hexbear seemed quite good) but your perception of their political views is not what I’ve observed. I tried to talk with them and they more or less instantly threatened me with physical violence and then defederated my instance.

      There is a reason they are so widely defederated. They are deliberately obnoxious to “outsiders” in a way that makes it seem unlikely that they’re positioned to succeed at any kind of leftist progress. Usually, attacking everyone around you is not correlated to long-term victory.

      I see people say stuff all the time like oh they are tankies who love putin, oh they are against human rights.

      https://hexbear.net/search?q=putin&type=Comments&listingType=All&page=1&sort=New

      They’re not really “against human rights” per se, as far as I can tell, but at least 50% of them seem to be fanboys for authoritarian regimes, and construct insane frameworks where those regimes aren’t actually violating anyone’s human rights, or “but ‘libs’ believe X Y and Z, those are wrong, and so by contrast with those wrong things, I must be right.” I think more than 50% of the comments in the above link fall into that latter pattern.

      Here are some examples of things from the above that are pro-Putin (or at least pro-Putin-adjacent) and also hilariously wrong:

      They’ll say this then unironically say that Putin just invaded Ukraine to be mean

      Putin is genuinely popular and his party is bolstered by the fact that both the economy and the Ukraine conflict are going well.

      Describing United Russia as far right is also not entirely accurate, it’s more like a catchall for anyone who is not a communist and not a western stooge. It includes some very right wing and nationalistic elements, but they are generally quite careful to marginalize those kinds of far right elements that would be destabilizing for the Russian state:

      Ethno-nationalists who would create conflict and friction with Russia’s many ethnic minorities, outright Nazis many of whom defected and now fight for Ukraine in Nazi units like the “Russian Volunteer Battalion”, etc.

      (That is a hilarious juxtaposition)

      It is also one of the most consistently and prolifically vilified countries, due to decades of Cold War propaganda, both during the height of the Cold War and after the USSR’s fall. It is not surprising then that some people would have a hard time wrapping their head around it as neither hero nor villain and as part of a complex dynamic on the world stage, with an even more complex history, grappling with challenging material conditions throughout. But embracing that complexity is an important exercise in getting used to viewing the world beyond the binary lens of good and evil that anti-communist propaganda loves to do.

      Got it. (And actually I agree that “good” and “bad” are very poor frameworks for judging state actors from the POV of the individual.) So what do you think of Ukraine? “Pure evil, Nazi government, why do you ask?”

      Zelensky knows that Putin is basically a moderate and is hoping for a hardliner to take power afterwards, eternal conflict is the only way to preserve his position and prevent nazi elements from merking him

      IDK. I looked over Hexbear for a while after what you said, and as long as you steer clear of certain topics, I think I can agree with you. (And, that was my experience before the defederation.) The same can be said of most Republican uncles at Thanksgiving, though, so it’s not really a solid endorsement of their good nature.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m sure they’re pleasant towards you, but the way they act when someone dares to disagree with them is repugnant.

        • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I appreciate you taking the time to explain your side,
          but there has been rudeness. Obviously, you shouldn’t stay civilised with people who hate you.

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Some Hexbear people were talking excitedly about advocating for Claudia de la Cruz. I pointed out that if Trump wins, they might go into concentration camps (And look! That is happening, some prominent leftists have already been disappeared).

          A tide of people pretended that I had said I would be happy about leftists going into concentration camps (I am not), sent me pig ballsacks, threatened me with death, threatened me with being stabbed with an icepick, sent me insults, agreed with each other about what a piece of shit I was, sent me custom-crafted memes to emphasize how much they didn’t care what I thought, and one person seemed like they wanted to have a factual conversation about it (they made some accusations about what reality was that were at least subject enough to proof or disproof to be worth discussing). I decided to try talking about it a little and it went about like you would think.

          I’m clearly not a bigot, racist, or et cetera any of those things. Hexbear operates under a sort of “no true scotsman” logic by which anyone who they disagree with is automatically one or all of those things, and so it’s okay to be horrible to anyone they disagree with. Again, that’s why they are widely defederated.

          Here’s the thread, including both my unwarranted smugness and Hexbear’s predictable reaction which has nothing to do with anti-bigotry (and, in fact, has played some small role in enabling the worsening of bigotry and genocide, now that Trump is in office): https://ponder.cat/post/525489/763331

            • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I do feel like I was smug and insulting out of the gate for more or less no reason. But also, I feel like demanding that I have to come in super respectful and kind, so they can respond in their famous chosen fashion, is laughable. I’m just speaking to them in the language that they clearly are approving of, just from the other side. That’s fair, to me.

              Basically, thinking someone is wrong, and telling them so and telling them why, is not “bad faith.” Not in any world. Again this is the Hexbear no-true-scotsman thing, where they’re super open and everyone is welcome except obvious awful horrible liberals who need to be attacked at every turn because they deserve it, and anyone who disagrees with them in any way is obviously that. This is why I tend to talk badly about Hexbear: Because they feel comfortable talking badly about everyone else, and hurling abuse and trolling at anyone and everyone, so fuck 'em. If they don’t want to be treated like that, they can open a conversation about the value of the social contract, and we can talk, but otherwise, oh well.

              Edit: The person edited their response, abandoning the debate I guess being unhappy with the nature of it. Seems reasonable, they’re not obligated to talk if they don’t want to. Maybe if I’d sent them a picture of a pig ballsack, they would have been receptive and felt comfortable with how appropriate the whole conversation was.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          And anyone who disagrees with them will certainly have at least one of those labels thrown at them.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I also think NATO is a tool of capitalist oppression,

          Yeah, that’s the take I was expecting to see. A mutual defence pact, formed to protect against the very thing Ukraine is experiencing, is a tool of oppression.

          Who is NATO opressing, exactly?

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            You can think of NATO as a millitary pact of gangsters. The members of NATO make the bulk of their wealth through fleecing the Global South, through processes of Unequal Exchange and brutal IMF loans that come with clauses requiring them to sell off nationalized infrastructure and resources. NATO’s role, other than Anti-Communism, is to essentially form “Big Stick Diplomacy” with countries that do not immediately play ball with their terms.

            We can see this in Operation Gladio, as an example. Even ignoring the fact that several heads of NATO have been former Nazis, such as Adolf Heusinger, Leftists have opposed NATO for its role in defending US and EU Imperialism since its foundation. You can see that in modern Communist orgs like PSL’s statement on the Russo-Ukrainian War, or FRSO’s Statement on NATO.

            That should give a background on why the Left generally opposes US millitary dominance over the world, and NATO’s role in that. If it’s hard to grasp, look at the ACAB movement. Why do people oppose a group that, on paper, is for “defending the people?” Because in reality, it defends a brutally exploitative system over all else, and thus racist and classist violence is a systemic part of that “defense.”

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Can you narrow it down? I think it’s good to have international cooperation on infrastructure, and is much better than exporting war and misery like the US does.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Riiiight. Sure.

              Nothing to do with the fact that pretty much every country that borders Russia has been invaded by them.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                Not sure which part of my comment you’re disagreeing with, so not sure how to respond. I included statements from Communist orgs directly, not Hexbear, so you could see that this is fairly universal among the anticapitalist left.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I think the fact that the Russian Capitalists (also called “Oligarchs”) control Russia’s industry, rather than the US and Europe like they did right after the dissolution of the USSR, has resulted in NATO buildup along Russia’s border, just like back during the Soviet era when NATO put the Jupiter missiles in Turkey, nuclear arms, and extended a NATO base beyond West Germany’s border and into East Germany, both of which prompted Operation Anadyr which led to the Cuban Missile Crisis. Those same Jupiter missiles, Kruschev would convince Kennedy to remove alongside Cuba removing their nukes, in an equal exchange of disarmament.

                    I absolutely believe Russia is a threat to those around them, sure, in the sense that all countries could be if a much larger power started massive millitary expansion along their borders. I don’t think there is anything unique about Russians ethnically that would cause them to go to war, but that there are relatively explainable factors.

                    Which of my original comment did you disagree with? The purpose of NATO? The Imperialism practiced by NATO countries? The ties to the Nazi party? All of it? It would help if you explained a bit, because as it stands I made a pretty thorough comment and you sort of just brushed it all aside, which is difficult to maintain a discussion around.

    • BB84@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sorry I should have clarified: not looking for Hexbear lore in general. I have seen a lot of Hexbear content, so I have a solid understanding on the site and the users. Don’t want to start a debate about that here because that debate always turn nasty.

      What I am looking for is: what happened in the past month-ish? How did you all lost your domain? How and when did you get it back? Why did it take so long for federation to be back? Is there any other change made to the site during this downtime?

    • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The news section there is great, and while there are a few comments that echo Russian stuff, that is easier to ignore than the massive USA liberal (conservative) views that dominate some other communities.

      In particular I like the middle east coverage .