• gosling@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t be too harsh on yourself, big corporations are the main cause of climate change. Unless we all collectively decide to give these companies a wake up call, I’m afraid there’s very little you can do alone

    • dangblingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Big corporations…that we keep rewarding with our money, incentivizing them to not change what they’re doing. Human consumption is the largest driver of climate change.

    • IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is there anything reasonable that we (those who have interest in living “like before” and won’t die of age within 30 years) can achieve? I feel like many things are very out of reach, and the population is just too heterogeneous to agree on something. Older folks where I live just do not give a fuck, and elected someone whose major interest is in removing rights from people they actively hate. At least one big city where I live has been without water nor electricity for several hours (days?) because the heat has messed out the infrastructure, and I feel like even in my country barely anybody is talking about it… It’s just very discouraging, I want to shift my perspective, but it’s not easy.

      • 🦘min0nim🦘@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, there are things you can and should be doing.

        People blaming ‘corporations’ while not doing anything themselves are a huge part of the problem. Out of the 100 largest corporations contributing the most CO2, almost all of them are fuel and energy based.

        So, number one - drives less, or don’t drive at all. This might change where or how you live.

        Number 2, buy 100% green power or install your own PV.

        These 2 things alone can be contributing up to 50% of your own greenhouse emissions. This isn’t ‘corporations’, it’s us buying power and driving around.

        After that everyday consumption is huge. So don’t buy shit to just throw it away. Only buy what’s necessary. Spend more on fewer things, and things that will last.

        And finally, do these things because you care. If enough people make some changes. It starts to seem normal. Then others do it too. And vote.

        The number of smart, tech savvy people here who think some boats and random companies are the source of impending catastrophe are sadly mistaken. The actual information on what’s causing and contributing is well researched and easy to find. You’ll be able to find an online calculator for your country which will give an averaged breakdown of your own emissions. You can use that to keep drilling into what actions will have the biggest impacts.

        Everyone needs to make changes to the way we live. Some need to go first for others to follow.

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Corporations can’t do these things with the public being complicit.

      We don’t hold politicians accountable and we just consume consume consume like crazy.

      • LucidNightmare@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Big companies only do what they do when the governments that they paid with bribes or “lobby” money look the other way while they fuck the planet up left and right like it’s a race to the end”

        Fixed it for you. Stop excusing the rich, and trying to place the blame on the consumers, friend. It’s disgusting.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The blame is on everyone. But if consumers… you know… stopped consuming so much garbage food, electronics, packaging for their shitty food and shitty electronics, cars, gasoline, etc, maybe the large companies wouldn’t produce so much of it.

          • LucidNightmare@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Such a bad argument again.

            My friend. The corporations have spent BILLIONS of dollars making sure all my options are as thin as possible.

            Tell me, friend. Where can I get the GOOD and HEALTHY food, the GOOD electronics? WHERE can I get these things WITHOUT spending the arm and leg that I DO NOT HAVE to spend? Enlighten me as to why you choose to blame the consumers whose options are LIMITED by the corporations….?

      • EhList@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly, corporations are selling their products and services to other people. This is something people can do stuff about. If you are wondering what you can do try shifting to a plant based diet as much as you can as our meat sources are a huge contributor to the problem.

        • FlowVoid@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or switch to a seafood-based diet, which has a much smaller CO2 footprint than land-based agriculture.

          • such_fifty_bucks@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            1 year ago

            “just eat seafood”. Brought to you by the comment thread on the article about the fact that the oceans are half way to literally fucking boiling.

            • I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              To quote The Goodies. “Why are you dumping oil and potatoes into the ocean?” “Well when the ocean is full of fish, potatoes and oil, I’ll throw in a match. Flash! Fry! Frizzle… Fish and Chips! Loads and Loads of Fish and Chips.”

              (This is from memory, will be somewhat paraphrased. Also see https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0591041/)

            • KnitWit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, I can’t give you gold obviously, so here’s my first comment ever. That comment was fucking gold!

          • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            We already massively overfish, is that really your solution? It’ll mean more intense factory farming of seafood, creating huge amounts of water based pollution.

            • FlowVoid@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Not all types of fish are overfished, some (like haddock) are sustainable. Just as some crops are farmed responsibly, and others (like California almonds) are not.

              • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I see you noticed that mackerel had it’s “sustainable” status removed. Sad times. ^^’

                I didn’t think Haddock had gotten back on the sustainable side either, most things can be done sustainably up to a certain volume. If the entire population turns its eye on it then demand far outstrips supply and goodbye sustainability.

                  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ah, Americans are redefining words again.

                    Normal English:

                    animals from the sea that can be eaten, especially fish or sea creatures with shells

                    US English:

                    fish or shellfish eaten as food

                    I’m gonna go with the definition that makes sense and say that no, we don’t have any local seafood, simply because we don’t have any sea.

      • dangblingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re being downvoted, but why? Human greed also extends to consumers. We don’t have to buy a thing because it was paraded around in front of us. I hate the “consumers have no agency, they have to buy stuff!” mentality. It’s morally bankrupt and just results in more finger pointing and zero action. Stop buying crap.