• 20 Posts
  • 214 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle


























  • probably ur battery already formed dendrites, causing it to have micro shorts internally and thus spreading heat in the phone case. a phone with 10w charging causes the battery to heat, let alone ur galaxy s20 charging at 15w. i actively cool my phone battery while charging by putting it in front of a fan so the battery stays cool and doesn’t form dendrites, and thus stays healthy. i also use a silicon case instead of leather else u ll be thermally suffocating ur phone: it uses metal as a case material for a reason. exynos for s20 seem to be made on the 7nm process node which usually should be efficient in term of temps. even when the cpu heats up (even using the 4g antenna, let alone a 5g one when active, the camera flash, all those heats up and causes the phone case to heat up too and then a chain cycle ensues by causing the battery to heat up sponatneously too, then it dries up faster than usual which compels the user to plug the charger and the infinite cycle of heat will never end…i never owned an exynos phone but sometimes a phone need to be underpowered so it could last.samsung phones are really overperforming but unluckely their users aren’t just thermal conscious. no engineering degree is needed to have a grasp over phone thermals but sometimes having some knowledge is needed if u cherich ur phone



  • idk what gaming implies but i think normal gaming is ok, on the other hand competetive gaming is absurd: 360fps@4k required, 10000dpi mouse (dafuq), optomechanical keyboard for nanosecond response lol (although i bought into one thou, didnt cost me a leg at least) …just game responsibly at 1080 at normal dps and all should be fine…also cutting on those energy drinks would be an extra. hardcore gaming is just straight consumerism. also i loathe twitch streaming…such a waste of bandwidth and resources




  • tbh chinese doctorate holders contribute to science as much as their european counterparts or even more: so they benefit europe or the us where the research is conducted. but when they start to excel or outnumber their european counterparts then they are considered as a threat and they need to be ousted: when ousted europe pulls the surprised pikachu face when those researchers settle in their home country and try to commercialize their findings: those people benefit from state grants and subsidies. Russia, a country as a large as China with major state budget and yet their scientific contributions aren’t as numerous, because there aren’t as much hard working researchers as the chinese ones, and the state is underfunded since all the oil money goes to oligarch pockets and what not to spend on expensive cars and luxurious living. So chinese success is earned by merit since the chinese think long term instead of other wealthy but silly countries. What is wrong about plagiarism ? everyone can copy, but what matters is what u make of it next:Steve Jobs did copy, Bill G also did, why china should be an exception: US also making last dicth efforts to hinder chinese progress. At least chinese wealth funds beneficial research instead of promoting wars and subdizing weapon industries. I hope europe sees through this because the us economy is built on theft and hypocrisy. Brics is a first step, but when more countries join the club europe will have to choose in which side of the scale it wants to be, and thus it decides on how it would tip whether in its favour or not. Even after destroying nordstream, europe was already tied with india and russia by buying russian gas throu india, and it didnt buy american gas, since it didn’t make any economical sense. the world would be more peaceful with the absence of american imperialism


  • Intel unveiled its first direct mesh-to-mesh photonic fabric at the Hot Chips 2023 chip conference, highlighting its progress towards a future of optical chip-to-chip interconnects that are also championed by the likes of Nvidia and Ayar Labs. However, the eight-core 528-thread chip that Intel used for the demonstration stole the spotlight due to its unique architecture that sports 66 threads per core to enable up to 1TBs of data throughput. Surprisingly, the chip consumes only 75W of power, with 60 of the power being used by the optical interconnects, but the design could eventually enable systems with two million cores to be directly connected with under 400ns latency. Intels PUMA Programmable Unified Memory Architecture chip is part of the DARPA HIVE program that focuses on improving performance in petabyte-scale graph analytics work to unlock a 1000X improvement in performance-per-watt in hyper-sparse workloads. Surprisingly for an x86-centric company like Intel, the test chip utilizes a custom RISC architecture for streamlined performance in graph analytics workloads, delivering an 8X improvement in single-threaded performance. The chip is also created using TSMCs 7nm process, not Intels own internal nodes. After characterizing the target workloads, Intel concluded that it needed to craft an architecture that solved the challenges associated with extreme stress on the memory subsystem, deep pipelines, branch predictors, and out-of-order logic created by the workload. Intels custom core employs extreme parallelism to the tune of 66 hardware threads for each of the eight cores, large L1 instruction and data caches, and 4MB of scratchpad SRAM per core. The eight-core chip features 32 optical IO ports that operate at 32 GBsdir apiece, thus totaling 1TBs of total bandwidth. The chips drop into an eight-socket OCP server sled, offering up to 16 TBs of total optical throughput for the system, and each chip is fed by 32GB of custom DDR5-4000 DRAM. Intel fabbed the chip on TSMCs 7nm process with 27. 6 billion transistors spanning a 316mm2 die. The eight cores, which consume 1. 2 billion transistors, run down the center of the die, flanked by eight custom memory controllers with an 8-byte access granularity.


  • 00:00:00 In this section, the video highlights the dire state of Britain’s economy and public services, attributing it to the austerity measures implemented by the government starting in 2010. These measures, introduced by David Cameron, were aimed at reducing government debt, but instead, they have resulted in a decline in education, healthcare, safety, and other essential services. The video explores the reasoning behind austerity, which was to save the British state from the bond markets and stimulate economic growth. However, with rising interest rates and a struggling economy, the policy has seemingly backfired. The debate between Keynesian economists and proponents of expansionary austerity is also discussed, with the latter arguing that reducing government spending could lead to a stronger economy. Ultimately, the video sets the stage to examine how austerity, meant to save Britain, has instead ruined it. 00:05:00 In this section, the excerpt discusses how austerity measures implemented by David Cameron’s government in Britain ultimately led to negative economic outcomes. Despite the theory that reduced government spending would stimulate economic growth, the reality was quite different. The private sector investment remained low, and the economy faltered while countries like the US, which avoided austerity, continued to grow. Government services suffered as a result, including the NHS and education sectors, which were promised protection but now face budget shortages and staff shortages. The failure of expansive austerity can be attributed to the fact that the anticipated investment and consumption boom did not occur, and the jobs created were of low quality, limiting real economic growth. 00:10:00 In this section, the speaker highlights that austerity measures in Britain resulted in a more unequal economy, favoring firms and capital owners over workers. The state’s attempt to make it more efficient led to a shift in employment from frontline personnel to policy consultants, negatively impacting the quality of life. The speaker argues that even sectors believed to be spared from budget cuts, such as the NHS and education, were affected due to population growth and inflation. The overall conclusion drawn is that austerity, in theory, could have saved Britain, but the evidence overwhelmingly shows that it instead ruined the country. The speaker emphasizes the need for nuance in evaluating austerity measures and points out that there are cases where properly implemented austerity could be beneficial, such as in countries like Kuwait. Nonetheless, the damaging effects of austerity on Britain are evident, regardless of one’s political inclination.