where you say that wealth attracts you
That’s not what I said.
super attractive and thus worthy of worshiping
And this is a non sequitur.
they all deserve the gas chamber treatment
O_o
incel
I don’t know what you mean by that.
diminishing returns
If there are any returns whatsoever, diminishing or otherwise, then that’s enough for humans to chase after it.
unless you’re a really disgustingly ugly person both inside and out
Indeed, humans are pretty ugly. Same with the rest of nature. Look around you. Would you say it’s ugly or beautiful when a gazelle is still alive watching a lion eat its insides. Or when a fly is immobilised as a spider wraps it in silk. Humans are no better. We are animals. The same forces are active inside us as in every creature. This is life on planet Earth. It’s not easy and most of the time it’s not pleasant.
You seem to be worshiping billionaires
Err… what gave you that idea?
How can we make sure Zionists are held accountable when their genocide is over?
You can’t.
What makes you say that?
This post title is disingenuous. DeSantis doesn’t say drivers have the right to hit protesters with cars under all circumstances, only when the drivers are threatened.
This is nonsense. Wealth translates directly into attraction as a mate. More wealth means more attraction. There’s no point at which increasing wealth stops increasing attractiveness. This is true even for the person with the most wealth because increases in wealth still increase relative wealthiness, which is still an increase in attractiveness.
Whoever thinks wealth accumulation is a mental illness doesn’t understand humans.
Being a billionaire (aka wealth hoarder) is a mental illness.
No it isn’t.
e.g. billions of tables, pokemon cards or toilet papers
These aren’t directly related to sex appeal whereas money is.
Edit: I mean I assume. Perhaps there are some people out there who see pokemon cards as a good measure of offspring-raising potential, I dunno. In which case, accumulating pokemon cards wouldn’t be considered a sign of mental illness either.
they are supposed to be the smartest people in the world, and we should worship them
Who told you that?
If you have to ask other people whether you should be a doctor, you should not be a doctor.
Linux phone but not open source :-(
usually peaceful interstellar community
Uhhh…
Giving up advancements in science and technology is stagnation.
That’s not what I’m suggesting. I’m suggesting giving up some particular, potential advancements in science and tecnology, which is a whole different kettle of fish and does not imply stagnation.
Thinking it’s a good idea to not do anything until people are fed and housed is stagnation.
Why do you think that?
stagnation
Why do you see feeding and housing everyone as stagnation?
The people who are motivated by advancing technology, aren’t motivated to overcome corruption, incline equality, to replace economic systems, etc.
That seems a bit presumptuous. Why do you think people who are motivated to advance technology aren’t motivated to overcome corruption, etc.?
All you’d be doing is stifling innovation, improvement, a reason for hope in the future
I disagree. I don’t see why focussing on feeding and housing people implies stifling innovation. And do you not see feeding and housing everyone to be an improvement and a reason for hope in the future?
Oh the irony that this is now homed on a UK server.
Fuck the Saxe-Coburg and Gothas