

I understand the skepticism and it’s justified, NFTs have gotten a bad rep. =) Personally, I never speculated on NFTs. It’s never been my thing. But the tech itself? Solid. It’s just been misused.
Just because a technology gets applied poorly doesn’t make it inherently bad. This is why I think they’re perfect for this use case:
An NFT is just a digital record of ownership for something non-fungible (i.e., unique and indivisible). Unlike fungible tokens like ETH or BTC (which you can split or mix), an NFT always refers to one unique thing.
In the case of DeDe, the NFT represents a parcel, not a jpg, not art. The NFT holds metadata like:
Parcel ID
Lifecycle state (e.g. Created, PickedUp, Delivered)
Reference to encrypted pickup/dropoff info
It’s not trying to “put the package on-chain,” just anchor its identity and state in a verifiable, tamper-proof way. If someone tries to fake a parcel NFT, the metadata won’t match, you’ll instantly detect it as invalid. This is way harder to spoof than a PDF shipping label or a database entry.
Same tech could be used for:
Title deeds
Car ownership
Event tickets
Access credentials
So yeah, NFT hype was a mess, but the primitive itself is useful when applied to real-world logistics, ownership, and transfer.
Thanks I’ll check it out. 😀