The world cares about what they do to other nations, not to themselves. Crazy gun policies? Slave labour in prisons? Your problem. Military expansionism, cripling sanctions, instigating chaos abroad? Very much our problem. That did not change.

I think your capacity to think is irrelevant or even played against you when the elites pour obscene amounts of money to change your perception of reality. Even the greatest minds can’t escape this.

Even if people realize the system they live in is called liberal democracy, not just democracy, they often fail to notice that said system is an implementation of a plutocracy, not a democracy.

It’s like watching an embryo develop into a child.

Venezuela is cursed with abundance of oil and proximity to USA.

Top can work too, but much less effective.

“The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the “smiling” fox.” - Malcom X

I read and I believe I understood your points. The problem is no one actually used the argument you are trying to oppose. You interpreted that comment too literally. Not once they said that no seen corpses meant no deaths. Had you not assumed so wildly and acted so bluntly, you’d be understood better. You can block me If this is annoying you.

The fact is there is hard evidence for a genocide in one case, and not in the other. If you have other reasons to believe the latter is still happening, then make them known. Otherwise it is no more plausible than telling elephants may dwell on the moon, despite no sightings.

I’m not the one calling valid observations dumb arguments.

So evidence is useless. Is that what you are saying?

It’s an attempt to legitimize an attack on venezuela.
The peace prize is unfortunately used to promote war.

Why only for certain foods? This practice is misleading at best.

Not everything is Trump’s fault. That country is a mess in itself.
Edit: I think I am providing yet another example of how facts hurt.

No worries. It was a valid concern. The key context here is that Lula is trying to reclaim national symbols from far right political opponents that use much less ambiguous slogans such as “brazil above everything, god above everyone”.

The slogan “x country for x nationals” when used to reinforce sovereignty in the face of external threats from colonizers is reasonable. It’s not necessarily xenophobic in nature.

Tiktok was also very popular, until it wasn’t anymore.

Germany is as much a proxy as it was before the wall fell.

State media in practice just means they disclose who owns them, instead of hiding their connections to government agencies through many layers of fake independent organizations.

Youtube has demonetized or taken down videos for much less, citing fears of driving out advertising. Now the advertisers are promoting genocidal messages to family friendly channels and their audience.