The portion of data is your quote. Or do you lack the capacity to know that text contains information?

You’re presenting it in your argument that I said that truthfully, when it’s a quote, which no one said, meaning I’m using sarcasm about a previous comment.

You’re too far gone to understand that though. I’m sure you’d much rather keep looking in the thesaurus, so have a blast with that.

Love that me wanting equal and fair treatment of everyone instead of fake positivity is “being weird”. I’m well aware your entire group would actually wish me harm if I got doxxed.

Doesn’t need to be physically, you clearly enjoy jumping on the “fuck him” train without second thought as to what I’m saying.

Lmao. No I wouldn’t. You’re all lashing out because you clearly dislike equality, you prefer a world where certain groups are emphasised or marginalized.

Not gonna happen from me. And that’s got you all sensitive, it’s quite funny.

In case you missed it, cherry picking happens to be a fallacy as well. Or did you drop your thesaurus in the toilet?

Telling you to have original thoughts instead of bandwagoning is an insult now, brilliant.

It’s awesome that you can’t understand my points, at least you’ve found your place on the dumbass scale…

Cherry picking my one argument that was an obvious use of sarcasm as if it was truthful is the fucking cherry on the cake. You must think yourself very intelligent.

Next time you would disregard quotation marks, do the world a service and shut up instead.

Yes, I’d rather like equality in treatment, thank you very much.

Keep regressing.

Because of people like you. Like I mentioned in my reply about people out for blood (you).

If you read what I wrote and interpreted it as that, you’re the one with piss poor reading comprehension, idiot.

It is true, in microcosms like communities where nothing ever slightly differently opinionated can be voiced as it immediately gets struck down and the writer labelled a bigot as bad as a Nazi.

That’s the vibe here.

If you can’t handle that that is a pedestal, where you stay locked in an echo chamber of positive reinforcement, that is your problem.

My perspective has not changed from the start, whether you label it something or other. And that is that neutrality is favourable over overly positive glitter.

People should not be celebrated or booed (well, some should, but that’s not my point here in this generalisation about normal people, and before you lash out, yes that includes trans people, fucking sigh). By that I mean that if I meet someone I shouldn’t be expected to be overly positive or negative about them, I should be expected to not give a fuck. As that is true neutrality. It’s borderline apathy, and it’s equal and egalitarian.

Thank you.

You’re the only person here who genuinely engaged.

I won’t carry on with this discussion because clearly people (not you) are out for blood. And don’t interpret this as me assuming you’ve sided with me and then lashing out, I know full well you mostly stand against what I said. But you at least read what I said. Which can’t be said for many other here.

So thanks again.

Zero evidence except all I had to provide? The comment was purged. As mentioned by another user, if you’d bother to read that, that is.

Meaning there is no proof. Are you too daft to understand that there is nothing to gain by lying here? I presented my point, you misconstrued it to fit your victim narrative, and now people are bandwagoning because internet points go up/down. It’s that simple.

“possibly sanitized” It was pretty much word for word. Not that you’re arguing in good enough faith to consider that in your “argument”.

If antithesis is anything that goes “against spirit of the community” then you’re wrong on so many levels that it’s not even worth explaining. But in the off-chance your occipital lobe hasn’t fried itself from so much bandwagoning, antithetical means diametrically opposed. Not slightly against the spirit of.

You can mental gymnastics your way into any point, still doesn’t mean you’re right. Clearly.

Let me know when you (if ever) start thinking for yourself.

Oh I don’t know, maybe when you said “nothing positive about your bigotry” as in, “asking for equal treatment is being bigoted”.

You’re not a clown, you’re the entire clown car.

Antithetical would be to be bigoted. Saying that neutrality is preferred over pandering is not bigotry.

You saying what I wrote was antithetical is disingenuous if not dishonest. But I know you can’t stop yourself from bandwagoning because just like every other sheep in this comment section you see every difference in opinion as dissent from the hive mind.

Have an original thought.

Try not being an asshole to me. Of course you can’t. It’s bandwagon time!

“Nobody claimed…”

Oh but they did. Just like you are, defending those views.