

It doesn’t appear your company pays a living wage if 3/4 its employees need Government assistance for food.


Yup, blindly following. Clearly that is my way. No independent thought whatsoever.


Perhaps we should force cars out so wagon makers can have their jobs back?
Perhaps we should force out wagons and horses to bring in a new age of rickshaws?
My take is, your take is pretty simple-minded.


Holy shit, its logical fallacy over and over with you.
I didn’t make any assumptions. If they can avoid animals now (which they can, and do), they can improve that detection and/or logic for cats that have disappeared under the car and not reappeared. That’s not even an assumption, much less a “big” one.
And you’ve never hit a cat that was hiding under your car? Are you sure? How can you prove it? Have you gotten out each time you drove away to make sure there wasn’t a cat left behind?
And you’ve driven 93m miles, so you can compare your extensive history and record of driving with waymo’s?
I personally don’t like the idea of driverless cars.
And there is your bias.
No one argues self-driving cars are “needed.” The point is, they are a significant improvement over humans when developed correctly.
I’ve got the gist already, time to move on. No point in letting the writers’ ending ruin what I’ve come up with.


I have faith that if they keep making errors like this, people won’t give them business. I have faith that they will fix socially unacceptable issues in the name of money.
Kindly fuck off with your misplaced judgement.


While our vehicle was stopped to pick up passengers, a nearby cat darted under our vehicle as it was pulling away,
There are plenty of assholes who will aim for cats while driving. This, at least, can likely be remedied fleet-wide and permanently with a software fix. These people are just looking for an excuse to rail against automation— as if a human driver would have definitely seen the cat.
Also, keep cats inside.
Note it’s made with, not from. So other types of animals (wild, working, etc) are probably included too.


Trump will take his sharpie and change their name to Bank of Mexico, then start an investigation into BoM’s history of funding Antifa.


Yes! Because we all know cliches are the strongest argument one can make.

President Donald Trump instructs senate Republicans to not work with Democrats and to go home (yt)
Also Trump:
Democrat shutdown


Does it matter where a good idea comes from?


This is gen z in a nutshell. Telling management how they will be managed.
I’m all for tearing down walls and rebuilding institutions, but wait your turn. Wait until you understand something of it. It’s unlikely a business can run only on the people you like.
And what a sad world that would be if we all divided up into our little cliques for the rest of our lives. No adversity. Nothing we don’t like to cause trouble for us. How boring.
Sure, take the best option for you. That’s the business world. But leave your demands in your head.


Because now they want the stock to go up.


Since we’re having fun, the other difference between .223 and 5.56 is the throat length, with 5.56 being longer. Wylde not only supports the higher pressure, but also splits the difference in the chamber to account for the difference in throats.
I.e., a .223 Wylde chamber has a longer throat than a .223 Remington chamber, but a shorter one than a 5.56 NATO chamber, which allows it to accurately fire both .223 Remington and 5.56 NATO ammunition.
I’ve been told shooting .223 in a 5.56 will wear out the chamber faster… but haven’t exactly tested that.

I remember headlines before the shutdown where Trump specifically instructed GOP members of Congress not to work with Democrats.
Seems open and shut to me.


His wiki bio indicates this guy has given exactly nothing to society. Yet here he is, using his unearned wealth to purchase the military.
Honestly it sounds like home assistant could be useful to you, if you have the time to tinker. Definitely can build rules based on sunset times.