You have to call the vanguard agent
Every millennial / Gen-Z person is not going to do this and get their money stolen. Why do companies do this?? It’d be more secure to even do this over live chat for a logged in session if they can’t be bothered to add this to the account settings page.
The raw comment is this:
[Digg.com](digg.com) didn't load for me, good start 😅
It’s missing the https:// protocol, so the link is assumed to be relative to the current page you’re on. It should have been formatted as
[Digg.com](https://digg.com/) and then it’ll look like: Digg.com
Ohh ok, yeah, I’ve seen the whole series.
I didn’t think it’s sad though, they were being honest with each other thinking they were about to die, and kinda grew because of it. Sometimes you have to put everything on the table. It’s not like they broke up and then were toxic to each other afterwards. I think it’s pretty healthy to be honest and reflect on the relationship, and then go to another world and destroy an evil spider thing together.
Out of the loop, what happened?
He’s the exception that goes against the saying “The desire to be a politician should bar you for life from ever becoming one.”
There are currently 7 in all of NYC:
https://portal.311.nyc.gov/article/?kanumber=KA-02226
https://www.thecity.nyc/2022/03/29/nyc-promised-public-bathrooms-still-waiting/
huh, really?? this post and the original is showing in [email protected] for me, and going there, I see two posts with the same link:
Original: https://lemmy.ml/post/41458701
Repost (this post): https://lemmy.ml/post/41482621
I don’t see this post in [email protected] at all, even when checking on lemmy.world directly. I don’t think this is a federation issue.
I’ve never seen any interview as invasive as this, but i think simple take home assignments are useful to weed out people who don’t have basic skills for the role, can’t read instructions clearly, and/or don’t care enough for the role. It avoids me spending 30 minutes to an hour interviewing them to just reject them.
The roles i interview for are mid level devops based, and we’ve found that the best way to do this is to provide the candidate a simple git repo with 2 branches, which can’t be merged due to a merge conflict of two text files; no coding required. Just asking the candidate to resolve the merge conflict and write a README with the steps taken is enough to have more than half of the candidates unable to complete the task. If we interviewed all those candidates first, and then had to reject them, it would probably be 1 full working day per month in aggregate that would be utterly wasted.
Am I missing something but this isn’t cross posted from another community, right? the original post was in this community, [email protected], so why repost if it’s less than 12 hours later in the same community?
Thank you for the details. What application did you use to make that diagram? It looks awesome and I’d like mine to look like that.
It should also be binding that if you declare that your assets are worth a certain value, the government has the option to buy the asset at that value, to avoid people under representing their net worth for unrealized gains.
Was going to say Arcane based on title but see you already saw that, which is good. Have you seen Common Side Effects?
Just watch out, some phone providers will disconnect you after a few hours on a call. During the pandemic when there were a lot of people unemployed and there were long waits for unemployment insurance offices, there were stories of people waiting on hold for 6 hours or more, and then getting disconnected, losing their place in line.
They are often also recording/transcribing the conversation when they put you on hold as well, and summarizing the call for the agent based on the transcript. When my ISP raises internet prices, I always have to call them to get the increase reversed. When I’m waiting on hold, i pretend to talk to my partner saying what my desired price is and that i’ll call a competitor afterwards if they can’t match so that gets summarized for the agent.
If they have an ad read in the video, like a creator saying the video is sponsored by XYZ Corp, those could also be paid based on views of the video (in addition to the ad impressions by YouTube). Those ads are handled externally from YouTube’s ad platform, but they do rely on YouTube analytics and views being reported as legitimate.
Love the old animation style in this scene. This is a good breakdown of the differences compared to the modern animation
Yeah, Honey is just exacerbating the inherent flaws in the system, and most of it can be dealt with having a limit of coupon usage and expiration of the coupons.
The thing which really upset me is advertisers pulling money from podcasts which have referral codes because of abuse from Honey. I’m not a fan of advertisements, but the referal codes were a simple solution since there’s no way to accurately measure if an ad was listened to. Honey causing advertisers to pull support for podcasts just pushes podcasts to closed ecosystems with more tracking and analytics, and takes money away from Podcasters.
I don’t think the person you’re replying to is disagreeing with you, they’re just pointing out that in this case, the jury didn’t have to nullify an existing law for the tow truck driver to be found not guilty.
They fall back to the Purcell principle when it’s convenient and didn’t get involved in Texas redistricting a full year before the next election, but when California does the same thing (via the legal avenues) all of a sudden it’s not too close to an election and they’ll likely mess with California’s redistricting. I despise the corruption of the court, but they could at least have the decency of keeping the corruption consistent.