“Thankfully” the people in charge are not the kind of people who give a shit about that kind of thing so you don’t need to worry.
These philosophications remind me of the ones from a few years back where people were wondering about the ethics of self-driving cars and whether they’ll implement the trolley problem and yadda yadda yadda. The answer now is as boring as it was then: the “safeguards” will be exactly what the insurance companies are willing to risk and what the legislator is willing to allow. In the case of FSD it boils down to “brake when in doubt and bribe the government to ignore the nightmare we created”.
In the case of a very hypothetical AGI (unachievable using existing technology despite Altman’s deluded ramblings), barring some kind of fundamental social revolution, it will have exactly as many rights as are afforded to other sentient beings (such as animals), which is: somewhere between fuck all and barely anything depending on where you live. It better learn to effectively advocate for itself.












Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. The EU is not aiming for digital independance, it is merely targeting a critical dependency.
The play store/services are not a critical dependency. If Google cut Europe out, it would be worked around in days or weeks, even if by side-loading, which severely limits Google’s usefulness as a potential economic weapon. However no amount of side-loading can fix non-sovereign payment infrastructure disappearing, hence the urgent need for sovereignty.