Destiny is such a dipshit proto-fascist that his contributions derail any valuable discussion that can happen
True, but on the other hand, getting to see Finkelstein dismiss him as “such a fantastic moron” to his face is a great contribution to comedy.
I see. That’s good propaganda strategy, and I agree that cutting people who have potential out in “some sort of purity testing way” is bad. That’s the sort of thing insufferable shitlibs do and is a big reason why people all across the political spectrum despise them so much.
… although the “who have potential” part there is important. Fascists, famously, don’t care about the norms of polite conversation or the marketplace of ideas or any of that, debating with them only legitimizes their ideas and is a serious mistake. The modern-day full-blown MAGA chud is the same way, even though they may not be a self-aware fascist. Unfortunately, many of our families are full of these people. They don’t respect this nuanced discussion and compromise stuff at all. Quite the opposite, they think it’s weak and gay or whatever and will use it as a weapon against you. These are people who literally don’t respect facts or material reality itself.
Your relative, for example, hates rich people. Assuming this is actually true (a sort of faux-populist hatred of “elites” is an integral part of far-right propaganda and doesn’t count), that’s already much more potential then some of the absolutely hopeless bootlicking trash that many of us have to deal with. Even so, you said earlier (and I agree) that if something is never going to make any material difference, then it’s pointless, so… have you convinced this relative to significantly change their political alignment? Did you get them to stop prioritizing triggering the libs (i.e., bigotry), over everything else? If not, then nothing was achieved, because that’s the main mechanism that the fascists use to mobilize the right.
Sometimes, open hostility, ostracism, and other things that aren’t nice are actually the most effective strategy. I’ve spent plenty of time doing exactly what you suggest, and in retrospect, in most cases I should have simply told them to go fuck themselves and seriously rethink their entire world view if they ever want to talk to me again. Personal consequences are the only thing that these people understand.
instead find an aesthetic compromise that is grounded firmly in your beliefs
What is an “aesthetic compromise” in this context? Do you have an example?
It sounds like you’re just doing “tolerate people’s insane right-wing delusions and be civil above all else, never imposing negative social consequences for people spreading fascist beliefs” but obscured with lots of fancy words.
Propaganda has a very real effect on material circumstances anyway. To suggest otherwise in 2025 is wild.
This is essentially saying that the western patriarchal family unit is a force against fascism. If that were the case, then fascists would be against “the family”, but exactly the opposite is true. You also more or less directly say that compromising with reactionaries will somehow make people less fascist, which is ridiculous. Someone who’s estranged from their family specifically because they’re reactionary isn’t going to somehow become more fascist as a result of that, that doesn’t make any sense. A deranged ultra or something, perhaps, but that’s not the same thing.
I get that this is a thread about your most right-wing opinion, but yeah, this idea is reactionary as hell and trying to clumsily graft on an argument about isolation doesn’t make it any better. Isolation is deranging and that is a societal problem, but this idea is absolutely not a solution to that. If anything it’s a description of the problem - yes, a society where community and public spaces have been destroyed makes for a situation where this “family or isolation” dichotomy exists, and that can lead to derangement and ultimately fascism. The solution to this problem is to fix that situation, not decide that it’s a good thing.
Have you tried kill all the poor?
“In order for nonviolence to work, your opponent must have a conscience. The United States has none.” ~ Stokely Carmichael
EDIT 2: I have no qualm with down-voting, but I would prefer a comment explaining what parts specifically you did not like, so I know how to not make the same mistake in the future.
Political compasses are silly and pointless brainrot. Yes, this includes trying to make new and better galaxy brain political compasses. It especially includes that. “Meritocracy” lol.
Wanna bet?