In his case, it’s personal:

https://willcountygazette.com/stories/671124585-if-he-saw-and-stayed-silent-he-s-not-a

And then they undermined that message that one time they made the zombies real, and probably a couple other times I don’t remember.

A lot of people will die before that ever happens

It looks pretty cute. But holy shit the mouse on that thing looks awful to use.

The only “open world” game that’s been a linear story survival sandbox that I’ve seen do it well is Raft. And that only works because of the medium of it being an open sea where the players can wander, then move through the story at their leisure.

You’ve been yellow mustard-ed!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReGLmaBl7jQ

The story of Abraham

Christians are under no obligation to circumcise so this only applies to Jews.

But they still believe it.

They didn’t say anything about jews being anti-trans.

It being sorta double think means it’s sorta simultaneously two different beliefs. But at its root that’s never the case, even a little bit.

I think there is a little more nuance to it than that. I don’t think anybody legitimately believes he did it and simultaneously didn’t do it.

There’s basically a slider of dialogue ranging from “he ought to have a fair trial” to “he didn’t do it” to “if he did it, I’m glad he did” to “we need more Luigis”

People are generally pushing that slider as far as they socially acceptably can for the given circumstance they’re in. You’re not gonna say the latter things in public or with your name attached out of fear of reproductions.

So what you get is a mixed bag of feelings, which are almost all pro-Luigi even if they’re different forms of it.

I’m proud of this community

If they existed it would be The Boys style super"heros". So I don’t know, I’d kinda prefer they didn’t know how to catch a punch.

Really coming out strong with the first promise being “WE DONT CARE, WERE DOING THIS IMMORAL THING ANYWAYS BECAUSE WEVE DELUDED OURSELVES INTO THINKING IT WILL GET US MONEY”

Speedy and public trial my ass. Fuck this fascist country.

you need a highly accurate model of what broke. Do you just take a bunch of measurements, then do your best to guess and check? Is there a process to this, or what does this look like?

There’s a couple different strategies. Taking measurements is often the most straightforward. And it’s generally not too bad because often times the thing you measure will be in round units, so you can confidently guess the true measurement intended.

For example, if I measure the diameter of a shaft that broke off, and it’s 10.1mm, then I can pretty confidently say I should make the CAD model 10mm.

An alternative method is to take a picture of the object from multiple directions, zoomed in and far away to make the view as orthographic as possible. Include a known distance like a ruler, and then you can past the image in the background of your CAD software and model off of that. Generally I find this more helpful for organic shapes that wouldn’t make much sense to measure.

I’ve had too much raw XML parsing for one lifetime.

‘Easy’ ‘solution’: Do game dev as a hobby, release as FOSS

We still use a bastardized mixture of soap, rest, and grapqhl with zero consistency.

Private schools shouldn’t exist either.