Actually on the side of law enforcement here, accuser has to provide burden of proof. It’s pretty hard to prove how stupid and ignorant someone is or is not. Edit: It would make defense by ignorance the default plea and abused horrendously.

Only thing I think law enforcement gets wrong is THEY are allowed to take the defense of being ignorant of the laws they are supposed to be protecting. If anything a cop wrongfully charging someone with an offense and then admitting they didn’t know what they were talking about should result in a larger punishment for them, not less.

Idk who you are referring to in this reply. The coworker who says you have to drink coffee black is the one who is going to notice if it’s burnt. So are you supporting them or against them?

My question is, Are they brave enough to do the airport scene from MW2?

You say valid but they tried to share a vice article. I think the ban was justified but the mod had to give a believable reason /s