- 38 Posts
- 7 Comments
1·3 days agoYou’re right! Vanguard isn’t sitting in a room hand‑picking Apple or NVIDIA for most of its AUM. The vast majority of those positions come from investors choosing specific index or mutual funds, and those funds are structured to track benchmarks rather than reflect discretionary allocation.
When people say “Vanguard’s holdings,” it’s shorthand for the aggregate positions across all Vanguard‑managed funds. At the fund level, that shorthand makes sense because Vanguard is the legal manager of the vehicles. At the company level, you’re right—it can be misleading if taken to mean Vanguard is actively allocating capital into those stocks. It’s really about how market‑cap concentration flows through passive vehicles, not Vanguard making stock‑picking calls.
You’re right that technically these assets belong to Vanguard’s fund shareholders, not Vanguard itself. The phrasing “Vanguard’s holdings” is really shorthand for “the aggregate positions across Vanguard-managed funds.” Since the majority of Vanguard’s AUM is in market-cap-weighted index funds, the top holdings naturally mirror the largest companies in the market.
The reason analysts and media use “Vanguard’s holdings” is because it’s a convenient way to describe how Vanguard allocates capital on behalf of its investors. It doesn’t imply Vanguard owns the companies outright—it reflects the scale of exposure their customers have through Vanguard-managed vehicles.
Yes, Walmart is a publicly traded company and its stock (WMT) is listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Walmart is publicly traded?
Well, Optum Home Delivery Pharmacy and Optum Rx are affiliates of UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company.
Billions 😘
Yes, I should have added another column to include data for Renault and Tesla; I only realized I missed it after I finished creating the chart.
Fair question! I tend to share charts and posts from 13Radar and MarketCapWatch because they consistently publish holdings data, fund breakdowns, and market structure visuals that align with the kind of analysis I’m interested in. I find their formats useful for comparing exposure, cap-weighted dynamics, and fund behavior across sectors.
It’s not about promoting a specific site—it’s about using consistent sources to build a coherent lens. If there’s another dataset or angle you think would add value, I’m always open to exploring it.