You don’t need to produce for profit, you can produce for use. Society can be organized in such a manner without having portions of society dedicated to brainwashing the masses into being consumers of useless goods like party favors for the sake of fat cats getting richer.

You can continue to pretend I haven’t thought of any of this and continue to talk down to me as you build a larger and larger strawman, it’s pretty funny.

Nope, but you’re free to continue building a strawman.

Profit is producing to sell goods in a positive feedback loop for more money. You don’t need to have profit.

Capitalism is continuing to decline and people are farther removed from the Red Scare.

Do you think systems built upon class hierarchy are resistant to corruption?

You can restructure society to not require profit. The economy exists currently purely to increase consumption and thus profit, rather than to fulfill uses.

Can you explain the structural issues you belive Socialism to necessarily have? Can you explain why they are inevitable in Socialism, and moreso than Capitalism?

Social Democracy historically still results in increasing disparity, and economic Imperialism. You can’t fix the issues with Capitalism with a band-aid.

Capitalism itself is corrupt, lol. Any class-based system will be.

No.

Police exist as a construct largely to protect Capital. Most people breaking the law do so out of desperation, rather than pure evil, and most people who are legitimately evil are so because of upbringing.

You can replace police with different structures, such as Social Workers, that can better handle situations without the use of violent action as the go-to.

So you’re one of those delusional “not real Capitalism” people? Real Capitalism hasn’t been tried yet, amiright?

Because America is becoming increasingly radicalized, left and right, and as such a center-right Neoliberal that upholds the status quo above all else is hated by radicals on both sides.

That’s Capitalism at work, lol

Anarchism isn’t simply a removal of all structure, but a replacement of existing structure with decentralized networks of Mutual Aid, Mutualism, gift economies, etc, depending on the flavor.

I admire anarchists for their principles and praxis in modern developing countries, where more Marxist groups have struggled, however I do disagree on policy.

That being said, I’d take a functional Anarchist society over this hellhole every day of the week in a heartbeat.

Producing party favors and other mindless bullshit, no matter how “ethically sourced,” is still consumerism at the expense of the environment. Bottled water is another great example.

Capitalism is antithetical to sustainability, and has to be wrangled into a sustainable position soon or the climate disaster will become even worse than it already will be.

Do you believe that every single action one must do be perfectly in line with leftist ideas to be a leftist? Is it not possible to commit evil for the purposes of, in their minds, securing the chances for achieving Socialism and Communism?

Stalin, by and large, was a leftist that was dedicated to the cause of achieving Communism. He was also a cruel, evil brute, who cared little for the Means of achieving it.

I prefer to recognize evil leftists to learn from them and their mistakes so as not to repeat them.

Mald, cope, seethe, all you’ve done is prove that you have no fucking clue what you’re talking about.

Do you think democracy is a bad thing? Why do you think authoritarian structures are good if its labeled Capitalism? Do you think Communism is when Mr. Bureaucrat sits down in his government chair and does a Communism? Lmao.

Is it brigading if people just think you have shit takes and downvote you without organizing or trying to brigade? Is that how fragile you and your worldview are?

Communism is based on the idea that individuals are all unique, with different skills, and works on allocating resources based on use and not on profit.

Why are you under the assumption that it’s the opposite?

I wish you had any principles.