• 0 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 3 days ago
cake
Cake day: January 16th, 2026

help-circle


  • Headline is super misleading… the article says that chat gpt told him it couldn’t give him drug advice, and that he should seek help. He goactually got good advice from chat gpt, but didn’t like it, didn’t trust the good advice chat gpt gave him, then spent months trying to get chat gpt to give him the dodgy advice he wanted.

    Of course chat GPT shouldn’t be giving that sort of advice, but man that headline is as misleading as it gets. He literally didn’t trust the advice he got from chat gpt to seek help.


  • he same HEAVY materials that made-up The ‘65 Ford Mustang’s body

    The 65 Mustang was not made of heavy materials. It was (at the time) modern unibody construction made of thin guage sheetmetal. I’ve owned a few. The 65 200ci mustang I had in my teens was one of the lighter cars I’ve every owned; 2400lb / 1100kg or something like that. It was very easy to push, which you occasionally needed to do because Mustangs were godawful piece of shit cars. I did for a while own a early production 65 289 K-code 4 speed. It was one of the rarer early Mustangs, but still a total piece of shit. The body panels were flimsy and dented easily, the bumpers would bend if you stared at them too hard.

    I recall cars of the 40s and early 50s all seemed to use a heavier guage sheetmetal, and body on frame construction. I’m not sure that’s a good thing, but they were heavier and sturdier.

    Also, if you look at solar panel production and EV energy consumption, I’m not sure that powering an old, unaerodynamic design is realistic with body mounted panels. It’s something like 3 miles per KWh to push a tesla model 3 down the road, and the big house panels are 400w panels. You can kinda do the math from there.