I mean, it’s public content now. The interviewed former member allowed it to be published.

They were posted on ACP_Leaks:

https://x.com/ACP_Leaks/status/1984050037652123855

ACP isn’t a party on a marxist sense. It’s the fandom club surrounded Haz (real name, Ali Hammoud, from Dearborn). Everything from their little events thay call Conventions to their day to day operations has nothing to do with the practices of a normal socialist group/party.

Haz and his mates on the leadership weren’t elected, it was a long shimmered personal project of Haz who somehow convinced himself that he could do entryism on CPUSA and steal that party. Just to find out the whole thing was going nowhere and was forced to start his own brand.

When confronted with the every day business of running a “party”, Haz struggles to keep up with the meetings and agendas. Joins late to his party business dates and always gives random excuses like how he had to take a long shit or how some guy in the gym looked him funny.

This “party” is Marxist-Leninist in name. I’ve interviewed several former members and all give similar stories. They are pressed by an otherwise absent leadership to post photo-ops of themselves picking up trash or doing other voluntaristic community labor nobody in their communities asked for. No support is provided otherwise, they are expected to come up with their own supplies and money for these actions.

The whole intention behind the “party” isn’t to build up a movement or organize the working class. But rather to reinforce the social standing of their leaders and maybe to be able to extract rent from the chapters that start their own businesses (yeah, I know, that’s a stupid idea on so many parts).

So yes, there are many angles to attack ACP from a marxist position without having to engage on liberal “they are authoritarian” side.