• 23 Posts
  • 312 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle








  • TBH I think you’re concern trolling, because you don’t like the topic. Instead of drama or trying to prevent discussion, what are some interesting things about the comment? I think this part is very true for many cults:

    I finally had a breakthrough internally and got the courage to go to therapy and try to reckon with the damage my upbringing did to me. and once that started to work, $CULT’s rose tint rapidly faded.

    Poor mental health is responsible for a lot of people falling down nasty internet rabbit holes. We should work to improve that situation.










  • There’s a number of major flaws with it:

    1. Assume the paper is completely true. It’s just proved the algorithmic complexity of it, but so what? What if the general case is NP-hard, but not in the case that we care about? That’s been true for other problems, why not this one?
    2. It proves something in a model. So what? Prove that the result applies to the real world
    3. Replace “human-like” with something trivial like “tree-like”. The paper then proves that we’ll never achieve tree-like intelligence?

    IMO there’s also flaws in the argument itself, but those are more relevant