that the review process “has been activated,” and that the graduate instructor was placed on administrative leave “to ensure fairness.”
In pursuit of fairness, I think it’s reasonable to label the Oklahoma University a bigot-friendly institution. Just while the investigation is ongoing, you understand. Certainly this shouldn’t be construed as punitive.
I’ve seen this quote several times, and almost always accompanied by notes that there’s not really any evidence he said this.
Also… In 1943 he was probably right, for the kinds of computers he’d have been talking about.
I feel like there was a missed opportunity to call it Androgynous or Androgynix.
These numbers are arranged in decreasing order, but probably aren’t directly related. The 39% doesn’t inherently encompass the other values, one can dislike his Epstein stuff and his immigration policy, but not his economic stuff.
The latest overall approval/disapproval stats I’ve seen are somewhere in the ballpark of 40/55% spread. So, your point almost definitely holds for some percentage, but that’s not really something that can be interpreted here, you’d need a specific breakdown.
None of what I said is disagreeing with your point. You’re reading into my response opposition that wasn’t offered.
If you have $1m, you can draw something like $30-40000 a year reasonably safely. That’s obviously a lot of money, but isn’t what most people in the mentioned countries think of as “living large” if it’s your whole income, especially for a couple/family. That puts you at about the median individual income for Japan and NZ, a bit above in Korea, and below for most of western Europe and Aus.
Obviously that’s without working, but that’s kinda the point. It’s wealth, but not enough that most people in those places would be comfortable not working if that’s how much they earned. Hell, in the US that wouldn’t even cover childcare for a few kids in many locales.
That’s cool, but I do that too. So don’t think you’re special, ants!