It proposed allowing judges jurisdiction over cases involving their presence in the state and also included measures to protect parents in custody disputes where one parent consents to the child receiving care and the other does not.
So it would give legal shelter to a parent that, in spite of the other’s non-consent and without preexisting legal authorization, goes and has a gender-affirming medical procedure performed on their child? Yeah, hard pass bro.
Not when “disinformation” is defined by the government.